The latest Church Militant Spotlight report on Fr. Groche and other sɛҳuąƖ predators in the SSPX

SSPX Pedophile Priest Flees Victim (churchmilitant.com)

Some of these cases are why I suspect that +Fellay is compromised.  Although ... is Fr. Pagliarani also compromised, since  he's in charge now, I guess?  Unless he is to +Fellay what Medvedev was to Putin when Medvedev became President, or what some people say Biden is to Obama (just a puppet).  I wonder if +Fellay isn't still really in charge despite putting Fr. Pagliarani's face out there in front.

Still ... about 50% of the Church Militant stuff is garbage, made up, false insinuations against priests without evidence, etc.  But Groche and Abbet are pretty clear-cut cases, and +Fellay has clearly been protecting them and playing the old pedophile shuffle.

Father Duverger was smeared.  CM smeared SSPX over the case of the one ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who was ordained ... since the latter came out and denied SSPX ever knew anything about it because he hid it.  CM brought an allegation against Fr. Angles, but there were no other cases and the one case, the only one who may have known anything, is no longer around to give deails (due to his tragic ѕυιcιdє).  They also smeared Father Kenneth Novak, implying that he was having relationships with married women.

So, it's a mixed bag with CM.  But there's no question about Abbet and Groche.

Still ... about 50% of the Church Militant stuff is garbage, made up, false insinuations against priests without evidence, etc.  But Groche and Abbet are pretty clear-cut cases, and +Fellay has clearly been protecting them and playing the old pedophile shuffle.

We're focused in this topic on the charges made in Nile's most recent Spotlight.  Forget, for the moment, that 50

% of CM stuff may be garbage.  Is 50% of this particular report garbage?  That's the question.