Author Topic: Paul Williams comments on Siri with sources (Read 4615 times)

MyrnaM · « **Reply #5 on:** August 20, 2010, 10:22:00 AM »

I would love to believe with all my heart that Pope Gregory XVII was our last true pope.

However, how does that change anything today! The only thing it would change would be that we are without a pope for less years, and maybe now, other Traditionals will realize that Vatican II was invalid. Uniting us, which is the Will of God, that we are united as one family under God.

Is that too much to hope for?

Belloc · « **Reply #6 on:** August 20, 2010, 12:49:53 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

The trouble in knowing the real TRUTH about the conclave
of 1958, all of the participants are now dead, and gone to
their eternal reward. I read where Pope John XX111,
Roncalli had the Cardinals and all that were involved in
the conclave take an oath of secrecy.
I never read what the penalty was if the secrecy was
revealed. However, no one talked, nor left any concrete
hints.
It will always be a speculation. Just something to keep
the bloggers busy.

Truth, hard to know.

V2 was invalid

Thursday · « **Reply #7 on:** August 20, 2010, 05:13:13 PM »

I'm just trying to see if anyone else on earth has seen these declassified docuмents. I understand completely that whether Siri was truly pope or not we are not bound by the innovations of the last 50 years.

As far as Williams, he's just the guy who said these docuмents say this. It's the State Department Docuмents we need to see.

Will that prove Siri was pope? Certainly not, but I'd feel a lot more confident about it I saw the files.

roscoe · « **Reply #8 on:** September 01, 2010, 04:08:23 PM »

Declassified in Apr 2005

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #9 on:** September 02, 2010, 12:57:22 PM »

Provide the docuмents.

I've searched for the ones cited at the National Archives. In fact, there is one hired right now that is researching it as we speak.

If they exist, we need hard copies. Evidence. This guy put these in a footnote of his book, and gave incorrect citations. His credibility is pretty well shot, because numerous people have attempted to contact him to get concrete citations, to no avail.

He will not return phone calls, he will not return emails. Not only is he an anti-catholic, he seems to me to be a fraud because he will not give the correct citations as to where he found these docuмents. The place that would have them has been searched pretty thoroughly, and we've not uncovered these docuмents.

So please, if you have these docuмents, rather than the footnotes "The Vatican Exposed," we'd all like to see them!