Author Topic: Paul VI the only anti-pope? (Read 13261 times)

Alexandria · « **Reply #35 on:** June 21, 2010, 02:02:52 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: Alexandria
Quote from: Belloc
Quote from: Alexandria
Don't you have a copy of The Rite of Sodomy?

why, should he or is it assumed everyone has a copy?

There you go.

go where? was just asking if everyone here had a copy, if it was a well read and owned book here.Do you have a copy? do you feel the hypothesis is correct in the book?

what are your feelings?

and sorry, still struggling with that urge, having trouble staying in the Sunshine and Gumdrops state......am trying though!

Yes, I do own a copy. And have read it several times. I have also spoken to her at length. She would know the consequences of putting something that was only hearsay or had little evidence to back it up in a book for anyone to read.

I wish his moral life was all we had to worry about with him. It's of no consequence compared to the devastation he helped unleash on the Church and, despite all his hand-wringing and "woe is me" statements, did nothing to stop.

Belloc · « **Reply #36 on:** June 21, 2010, 02:09:02 PM »

weak administrator and vacilator..

roscoe · « **Reply #37 on:** June 21, 2010, 02:34:15 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: Jamie
Quote from: roscoe
Someone was elected when the white smoke appeared. Are you prepared to say that the smoke was released by mistake? If not what do U think happened?

As the conclave was closed I don't know what happened. All I know is that Siri wasn't elected. If he was - and was therefore the valid Pope, he was a bad one who did equally nothing to help the situation when it began to collapse the Church - he even begged Archbishop Lefebvre not to consecrate the Bishops.

In researching for the answer to your other question (about the source of Siri himself denying it) I have discovered that I am wrong on that point and I withdraw it and apologise. In reality, Cardinal Siri refused to speak about the conclave.

Jamie, ask him why there are conflicting reports of white smoke and how that has happended in the past and since Siri/1958

My understanding is that there is no question of the white smoke. Some however will debate what it means.

Pls be specific as to when this has happened in the past or since 1958.

roscoe · « **Reply #38 on:** June 22, 2010, 03:28:55 PM »

The Forum is still waiting for a response to the above.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #39 on:** June 22, 2010, 04:56:56 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Quote from: roscoe
It is entirely possible that Gregory XVII was not a good Pope but he isn't as bad as Leo X and Clement VII.

Mo is that Paul VI(6) is an actual anti-pope. How can Paul VI(6) and Formosus be the only anti-popes when the Church has formally declared approx 40 of them?

Name some others, I don't remember any other possible anti-Popes.
Just type anti-popes into a search engine.

I did that yesterday, I see what you mean. However, some of the "anti-Popes" listed I wouldn't really consider anti-popes.