Author Topic: Paul VI the only anti-pope? (Read 13263 times)

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #10 on:** June 19, 2010, 08:51:48 PM »

It must be remembered that Siri signed all the docuмents
of V2,and imposed the new mass, and the reformed
sacraments in his diocese.
Where was the resistance from Siri, I have not read of
any.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #11 on:** June 19, 2010, 08:54:17 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

It is entirely possible that Gregory XVII was not a good Pope but he isn't as bad as Leo X and Clement VII.

Mo is that Paul VI(6) is an actual anti-pope. How can Paul VI(6) and Formosus be the only anti-popes when the Church has formally declared approx 40 of them?

Name some others, I don't remember any other possible anti-Popes.

roscoe · « **Reply #12 on:** June 19, 2010, 08:57:45 PM »

There are approx 40 of them and they are easy to find with a search engine. I have just looked at two of them and Formosus is not to be found.

There is a book by John Wilcock-- Popes and Anti-popes.

roscoe · « **Reply #13 on:** June 19, 2010, 09:03:01 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

It must be remembered that Siri signed all the docuмents
of V2,and imposed the new mass, and the reformed
sacraments in his diocese.
Where was the resistance from Siri, I have not read of
any.

I have said that the Siri thesis is not w/o probs, but just the same-- could the source of the above info be sited? Especially the allegation that he signed all of the v2 docuмents. I am aware that he did submit to the new mass at one point. Acc to TCW, he was under duress.

roscoe · « **Reply #14 on:** June 19, 2010, 09:31:12 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

There are approx 40 of them and they are easy to find with a search engine. I have just looked at two of them and Formosus is not to be found.

There is a book by John Wilcock-- Popes and Anti-popes.

By two of them I of course mean two sources that can be found with a search engine.