Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Patrick Henry Omlor  (Read 96436 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Persto

  • Supporter
Re: Patrick Henry Omlor
« Reply #165 on: August 16, 2026, 01:28:47 PM »
https://archive.org/stream/huttongibson_robberchurch_book/huttongibson_robberchurch_book_djvu.txt
The Robber Church - Part 2


The Will Of "The People"
To try to justify their every subversive machination, the Robbers consult their
catalogue of phony pretexts, cliches and specious "reasons": returning to
"primitive practices," restoring "simplicity" to the liturgy, implementing their "new
insights" into the meanings of certain Scriptural passages, making the pilgrim
Church relevant to modern times. Though all laden with duplicity, the one about
how "the people wanted the changes" is a naked barefaced lie. Granted that on
an average day at Vatican II there was as much deceit, intrigue, subversion and
fraud afoot as there is on an average day at the U.N., nevertheless on occasion a
"Progressive" would come out with the undisguised truth. Take, for example, the
utterly candid remarks of Bishop William Duschak of the Philippines, made at a

press conference on Nov. 5, 1962. The following account is quoted from pp. 38-
9 of Wiltgen, op. cit. (with emphasis added) :

'"My idea,' he (Duschak) said, 'is to introduce an ecuмenical Mass, stripped
wherever possible of historical accretions .... using language and gestures that
are understandable.' ... Bishop Duschak did not accept the conventional reasons
for keeping the Canon of the Mass intact. 'If men in centuries gone by,' he said,
'were able to choose and create Mass rites, why should not the greatest of all
ecuмenical councils be able to do so? Why should it not be possible to ordain
that a new mass formula be drawn up with all due reverence, one that is suited
to, desired and understood by modern man ... ?'... (T)he rite, form, language, and
gestures would be accommodated to our modern age. ... The entire Mass,
moreover, should be said aloud, in the vernacular, and facing the people. 'I
believe it is also likely that if the world receives such an ecuмenical form of
Eucharistic celebration ... etc. ...' Asked whether his proposal originated with the
people he served, he answered, 'No, / think they would oppose it, just as many
bishops oppose it. But if it could be put into practice, I think they would accept it. '
... Before the Council ended, the Commission for the Implementation of the
Constitution on the sacred Liturgy had already approved of three distinct Mass
formulas on a limited experimental basis, in which the entire Mass, including the
Canon, was to be said aloud, in the vernacular, with the priest facing the people.
A part of Bishop Duschak's proposal was already being put into practice.".
All, mind you, because "the people" wanted it!


Offline Persto

  • Supporter
Re: Patrick Henry Omlor
« Reply #166 on: August 17, 2026, 04:34:23 PM »
https://archive.org/stream/huttongibson_robberchurch_book/huttongibson_robberchurch_book_djvu.txt
The Robber Church - Part 2


"IT CANT HAPPEN HERE"
There is a certain "argument" (if you can call it that) which some persons
occasionally raise against those who believe that the "English Mass" is invalid.
For the very reason that this "argument" is not based on reason, nor on theology,
nor on logic, etc., but is based solely on emotion, it is perhaps the most difficult
one to answer. Advanced chiefly by laypersons, this "argument" is, pure and
simple, that so dreadful a thing as the Mass being taken away couldn't
conceivably happen. "It is too impossible to be true," they say. Besides, this
change in the Consecration Form from "many" to "all men" is really not
significant. It is so slight a change, so imperceptible almost. What these persons
cannot bring themselves to accept is that most of the "services" in the erstwhile
Catholic churches are just that, namely, "services," and not the offering of the
True Sacrifice.

On so ominous a day, when an invalid "Mass" would be introduced, surely there
would be convulsions of nature, and most likely the sun would fail to shine. But
the sun has continued to shine every day, the church bells continue to ring, and
the People of God continue to attend their services. In many cases, moreover,
definite appearances of outward devotion and piety continue to be manifest :
some persons continue to recite the Rosary, some still pray the Magnificat, some
priests even continue to give good "solid" sermons. So many Catholics continue
to act, look, and comport themselves as devout Catholics, - could so many
persons be deceived? Take, for example, the pastor. Despite his faults and his
many recent compromises, surely such a venerable man, so long a priest, could
not fall so low as to be saying invalid Masses! No, it just cannot be true!

Of course, the Mass was once deliberately destroyed by some Satan-directed
Innovators in England. But that was long ago and far away. It can't happen
here. And besides, that time in England it was done by trickery; the people
wouldn't have stood for it, had they known what was happening. No, it can't
happen here.

Let us hear the Words of Cardinal Henry Edward Manning, second Archbishop of
Westminster, who died in 1892. From The Blessed Sacrament, the Centre of
Immutable Truth :

"For where the Blessed Sacrament is not, all dies. As when the sun
departs all things sicken and decay, and when life is gone the body
returns to dust; so with any province or member of the Church. There was
a time when the truth and grace which went out from Canterbury and York
spread throughout the whole of England, and bound it together in a perfect
unity of faith and communion... There was but one jurisdiction reigning
over all the people of England, guiding them by a divine voice of
changeless faith, and sanctifying them by the Seven Sacraments of
grace."

"But then the grand old churches were the majestic tabernacles of the
Word made Flesh. Jesus dwelt there in the Divine Mystery of the Holy
Eucharist. His presence radiated on every side, quickening, sustaining,
upholding the perpetual unity of His Mystical Body."

"Then came a change, slight indeed, to sense, but, in the sight of God,
fraught with inexhaustible consequences of supernatural loss. 'Does any
one know the name of the man who removed the Blessed Sacrament from
the cathedral of Canterbury, or from York Minster? Is it written in history?
or is it blotted out from the knowledge of men, and known only to God and
His holy angels? Who did it, and when it was done I cannot say. Was it
in the morning, or in the evening? Can we hope that some holy priest, in
sorrow, yielding to the violence of the storm then falling upon the Church,
out of love to his Divine Master, removed His Eucharistical Presence to
save it from profanation; or was it some sacrilegious hand that dragged
Him from His throne, as of old He was dragged from Gethsemane to
Calvary?"

"We cannot know. It was a terrible deed; and that name, if it be recorded,
has a terrible brand upon it. But a change which held both on earth and in
heaven had been accomplished. Canterbury and York went on the day
after as the day before. But the Light of Life had gone out of them. Men
were busy as not knowing or not believing what was done, and what
would follow from the deed. There was no Holy Sacrifice offered morning
by morning. The Scriptures were read there, but there was no Divine
Teacher to interpret them. The Magnificat was chanted still, but it rolled
along the empty roofs, for Jesus was no longer on the altar. So it is to this
day. There is no light, no tabernacle, no altar, nor can be till Jesus shall
return thither. They stand like the open sepulchre, and we may believe
that angels are there, ever saying, 'He is not here. Come and see the
place where the Lord was laid." 1

"But this is not all. The change, so imperceptible to sense, in the
supernatural order is potent and irresistible. The centre of the order of
grace had been taken away, and the whole had lost its unity and
coherence. ... Straightway all began to dissolve and go to pieces. The
sinews relaxed and lost their tenacity, the joints and bands of what had
been the Mystical Body parted asunder."






Offline Persto

  • Supporter
Re: Patrick Henry Omlor
« Reply #167 on: August 18, 2026, 05:14:01 PM »
https://archive.org/stream/huttongibson_robberchurch_book/huttongibson_robberchurch_book_djvu.txt
The Robber Church - Part 3

"Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus" 
A well-known doctrine continually taught and repeatedly proclaimed by the
Magisterium of the Church is that '"Outside the Church there is no salvation"

This is a dogma of our Faith, and, as such it is infallibly true and it admits of
absolutely no exceptions. In holding to this dogma we are bound absolutely to
understand it and to profess it as the Church Herself understands it, following this
prescription laid down by Pope Pius XII in his encyclical Humani Generis :

"Hence Our Predecessor of immortal memory, Pius IX, teaching that the most
noble office of theology is to show how a doctrine defined by the Church is
contained in the sources of revelation, added these words, and with very good
reason: 'in that sense in which it has been defined by the Church'. "

Our discussion of this subject by using the most authentic sources will explain
this dogma "in that sense in which it has been defined by the Church." In doing
so, we will follow the scholarly theological explanations of it so brilliantly
expounded by the late Monsignor Joseph Clifford Fenton in his book entitled,
"The Catholic Church and Salvation," the Newman Press, 1958; and we will be
quoting from and citing this book often in this article.

In the course of gaining a clear understanding of this dogma, we will encounter
certain key words and phrases, which must be mastered and understood in their
precise and exact meanings in which the Church uses them. For example: in
the statement itself "Outside the Church there is no salvation" we must have
clearly in mind the exact meanings of: (1) "outside" as opposed to "within"; (2)
"the Church"; and (3) "salvation." Lest anyone might think that this is to belabor
the obvious or the elementary, let it be said here that these very words have
often been the source of misunderstandings and false notions about this
doctrine. Also, we must know the precise and rigorous meanings of: ( I ) "the
faithful"; (2) "Mystical Body"; (3) "member" of the Mystical Body, as opposed to
"non-member"; (4') "explicit desire" for membership; (5) "implicit desire" for
membership; (6) "invincible ignorance." All these terms will be explained in the
course of this article, according to the meanings given them by official papal
docuмents of the Church.

To understand this dogma and to profess it as the Church teaches it, we need to
consider all the teachings concerning it that the Church has laid down. To
consider only a part of this body of teaching, while overlooking, disregarding, or
neglecting other parts of it, is bound to lead one astray. For such selecting or
"picking and choosing" is the very soul, and the definition, of heresy.

As stated earlier, the absolute necessity of the Roman Catholic Church for the
attainment of eternal salvation is a dogma, having no exceptions whatsoever,
which we must believe and profess under the penalty of severing ourselves from
the Mystical Body, which is the Church. "A dogma is a truth which the Church
finds in Scripture or in divine apostolic tradition and which, either in solemn
judgment or in its ordinary and universal teaching activity, it presents to its people
as a doctrine revealed by God and as something which all are obligated to
accept with the assent of divine and Catholic faith" (Fenton, op. cit., P. 3).

Though it may seem at first to be a contradiction, or at least a paradox, the
Church also teaches - and this is actually a part of or an aspect of the same
dogma "Outside the Church ..." - that a person who dies without ever becoming
an actual member of the Roman Catholic Church can attain eternal salvation.

The word "can" has attached to it very specific and rigorously defined conditions,
which will be explained a little later. Consequently, we have these two teachings,
or rather two aspects of the same dogma, namely: (1) Outside the Roman
Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation; and (2) It is possible for a non-
member of the Catholic Church to attain eternal salvation.

In Interdum #1 ("Insights Into Heresy"), we saw that the nature of heresy is to
exaggerate or overemphasize one aspect of a truth, so that another different, but
related, aspect is under emphasized and eventually altogether denied. Some
twenty or twenty-five years ago, a group of Catholics centered in the Archdiocese
of Boston began to overemphasize, and then to distort, the first truth: "Outside
the Church there is no salvation." As could have been predicted, this
exaggeration took its toll of the second, closely related, truth that it is possible for
a non-member of the Catholic Church to be saved. The principal figure in this
so-called "Boston Heresy Case" was eventually excommunicated on Feb. 4, 1953.

Today the pendulum has swung back in the other direction, and we can now
perceive the "rebound" from the "Boston Heresy." Today the second of our pair
of truths - that a person can be saved even though he dies without ever
becoming an actual member of the Catholic Church - is so exaggerated and
overstressed that the necessity of the Roman Catholic Church for salvation is
being emphatically denied in some quarters. The conditions attached to this
word "can," which are very specific, are being entirely overlooked and scorned
by the Robber Church, so that nowadays non-membership in the visible Roman
Catholic Church is actually regarded as, practically some sort of sacrament!
"Some reduce to a meaningless formula," said Pope Pius XII, "the necessity of
belonging to the true Church in order to gain eternal salvation" (Humani Generis).
Though occasionally giving lip service to this dogma, the Robber Church, and
particularly the Vatican 1 1 decrees, have truly reduced to a "meaningless
formula" the doctrine that there is no salvation outside the Church.



Offline Persto

  • Supporter
Re: Patrick Henry Omlor
« Reply #168 on: August 19, 2026, 06:00:51 PM »
https://archive.org/stream/huttongibson_robberchurch_book/huttongibson_robberchurch_book_djvu.txt
The Robber Church - Part 3

Some Early Pronouncements
The Creed "Quicuмque," which is also known as the Athanasian Creed, begins
thus: "Whoever, wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold to the Catholic
faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt
perish in eternity." "Christ teaching from the ship," remarks the Doctor St. Hilary,
"signifies that those who are outside the Church can never grasp the divine
teaching; for the ship typifies the Church where the word of life is deposited and
preached. Those who are outside are like sterile and worthless sand; they
cannot comprehend" ( Comment , in Matt, xiii, n.1).

Some of the earliest actual doctrinal pronouncements by the Church's
magisterium on the matter of "no salvation outside the Church" are those of the
early part of the 13th century. In the profession of faith that he laid down for the
Waldensians who wished to return to the Church, Pope Innocent III (1208)
included the following: "We believe in our hearts and we profess orally that there
is one Church, not that of the heretics, but the Holy Roman Catholic and
Apostolic [Church], outside of which we believe that no one will be saved."

Seven years later (1215) the Fourth Lateran Council (which was the twelfth
Ecuмenical Council in the history of the Church) defined: "There is, then, one
universal Church of the faithful ( una ... fidelium universalis ecclesia), outside of
which no one at all is saved ( extra quam nullus omnino saivatur)."

From the above we may draw the following conclusions and observations (cf.
Fenton, op. cit., p.6) : (1) There is only one true Church of God. (2) This one true
Church is the Roman Catholic Church, which is a social unit properly called "the
universal Church of the faithful" (3) No one at all (nullus omnino) can be saved if,
at the time of his death, he is "outside" of this society. (4) The above statements,
1-3, are divinely revealed truths clearly contained in a dogma solemnly defined
by an Ecuмenical Council.

At this point it should be noted that even many heretics and non-Catholics can
and do accept statements (1) and (3) above. They will admit that there is only
one true Church outside which there is no salvation. However, what do they
mean by "the Church?" What is their "Church" which is necessary for salvation?
To them this "Church" is an invisible society, the sum total of all the "good" men
and women on earth (whoever and wherever they are), or those who are leading
good and upright "Christian" lives, or, simply, their "one true Church" consists of
the elect or the predestined.

On the contrary, the Catholic Church teaches that this one true Church outside
which no one at all is saved is the Roman Catholic Church, a visible society, the
Mystical Body of Christ, governed by a visible head, the Vicar of Christ on earth,
the Bishop of Rome. The Church teaches, moreover, that the membership of
this visible society does not consist solely of "good" people or those who "lead
good Christian lives." At any given time there are some actual members of this
universal Church of the faithful who are not good, who are not in the state of
sanctifying grace, and who are not going to be counted among the predestined.

The expression of Lateran Council IV, "universal Church of the faithful," deserves
a brief comment. Who are "the faithful?" "The faithful" are not, as Vatican 11
would seem to indicate (cf. the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, especially
its chapter on "The People of God," and also the Decree on Ecuмenism in its
entirety), are not all good Christians who have been baptized. In the traditional
technical language of the Church the word fideles (the faithful) has a very
specialized meaning. It means those who (a) have been baptized and who (b)
profess the Roman Catholic faith; in short, simply the Catholic. (Cf. Fenton, op.
cit., pp. 8-9). Thus, for example, a catechumen (i.e., a person who, taking
instructions to become a Catholic, has the explicit desire to enter the Church as a
member) is not one of the fideles. One may here recall the divisions of the Holy
Mass into the "Mass of the Catechumens" and the "Mass of the faithful."

Therefore, it should be unmistakably clear just precisely what is meant by "the
Church" in the axiom, "No salvation outside the Church." Let us now proceed to
study the meaning of the word "salvation."






Offline Persto

  • Supporter
Re: Patrick Henry Omlor
« Reply #169 on: August 20, 2026, 04:41:30 PM »
https://archive.org/stream/huttongibson_robberchurch_book/huttongibson_robberchurch_book_djvu.txt
The Robber Church - Part 3

What Is Salvation?

A person who, in the course of a long airplane trip, is routinely transferred from
one plane to another in order to make a connecting flight is not said to be
"saved." To be saved means to be transferred to a situation or state of security
or safety from a situation which, if remained in, would mean certain mortal
danger. Hence, a person who gets transferred from an airplane containing a
bomb about to explode to another airplane which contains no bomb or other
hazard, would be said to be "saved."

In the spiritual order, the process of salvation has an essential requisite the
remission of sins. No one is saved ultimately - that is, no one eventually attains
the enjoyment of the Beatific Vision, seeing God "as He is" - unless that person
dies in the state of sanctifying grace. To be in the state of sanctifying grace
means, stated negatively, to be in a state in which the soul is not stained by
original or mortal sin. Stated positively, it means to be in a state of friendship
with Almighty God, living a life of supernatural charity. Why do we say
"supernatural" charity? Because the attainment of the Beatific Vision is
absolutely beyond the natural powers or abilities of man, and this supernatural
end demands supernatural means of attaining it. The possession of God is
above (super) the natural activities or potencies of human beings. As a
consequence, we say that a person in the state of sanctifying grace is living the
supernatural life. He is living a life in which there is a true love of God, or charity,
which must be built upon supernatural ( i.e., beyond man's natural powers) faith,
as defined by the Vatican Council in 1870:

"Since man is wholly dependent on God as his Creator and Lord, and since
created reason is completely subject to uncreated truth, we are bound by faith to
give full obedience of intellect and will to God who reveals. But the Catholic
Church professes that this faith, which 'is the beginning of human salvation 1 , is a
supernatural virtue by which we, with the aid and inspiration of the grace of God,
believe that the things revealed by Him are true, not because the intrinsic truth of
the revealed things has been perceived by the natural light of reason, but
because of the authority of God Himself who reveals them, who can neither
deceive nor be deceived."

"But," continues this decree, "since 'without faith it is impossible to please God'
(Heb. 1 1 :6) and to attain to the fellowship of His sons, hence it follows that no
one is justified without it; nor will anyone attain eternal life except 'he shall
persevere unto the end in it' (Matt. 10:22, 24:13 ). Moreover, in order that we
may satisfactorily perform the duty of embracing the true faith and of constantly
persevering in it, God, through His only-begotten Son, has instituted the Church,
and has equipped it with manifest signs of the fact that He has instituted it, so
that it may be acknowledged by all as the guardian and teacher of the revealed
word.".

Now, there is no alternative to being saved, other than being lost. Every man will
either possess the Beatific Vision for all eternity, of else he will not possess it. In
this life, at any given time, a person either has supernatural charity or he does
not have it; he is either in the state of sanctifying grace, friendship with God, or
else he is in a state of aversion or enmity towards God by being in the state of
original and /or mortal sin. There is absolutely no middle ground or "neutrality"
possible here.

The remission of sins is, as we have said, an essential requisite for the
attainment of eternal salvation. And, furthermore, it is a divinely revealed truth
that there is absolutely no remission of sins outside the Catholic Church. This is
clearly and unequivocally declared by Pope Boniface VIII in his famous Bull
Unam Sanctam (Nov. 18, 1302): "We are bound by the obligation of faith to
believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church, and we
sincerely profess this [Church] outside of which there is neither salvation nor the
remission of sins ( extra quam nec salus est, nec remissio peccatorum )." This
Bull, which repeats and amplifies the teachings already cited (i.e. , those of Pope
Innocent III and Lateran IV), concludes thus: "Furthermore, we declare, state,
define and proclaim that for every human creature submission to the Roman
Pontiff is absolutely necessary for salvation ( omnino de necessitate salutis)."

Since there is no possibility of the remission of sins outside the Catholic Church,
it follows that one cannot possibly be living the supernatural life outside this
divinely established society. And the only alternative to living this supernatural
life within the Catholic Church is clearly spelled out by yet another magisterial
pronouncement: "It [the sacrosanct Roman Church, established by the voice of
Our Lord and Saviour] firmly believes, professes and teaches that none of those
who do not exist within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but Jews, heretics,
and schismatics, can become partakers of eternal life; but that they are going into
the everlasting fire which is prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they
become associated with it before they die ... ; and that, however great his
almsgiving may be, and even though he might shed his blood for the name of
Christ, no one can be saved unless he remains within the embrace and the unity
of the Catholic Church" (The Decree for the Jacobites, the Bull Cantate Domino,
published by Pope Eugene IV on Feb. 4, 1442, and included in the "Acts" of the
Council of Florence, the seventeenth in the series of Ecuмenical Councils of the
Catholic Church) .