Author Topic: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist (Read 5147 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #10 on:** February 11, 2022, 12:19:15 PM »

Quote from: SeanJohnson on February 11, 2022, 12:15:52 PM

Lad and Matthew-

The 7 pieces of evidence are from COFFIN, not me.

They are posted by him at the link Lad posted in the OP.

Right, I understand. I'm just reacting to the comment he made.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #11 on:** February 11, 2022, 12:21:46 PM »

Here's what's going on. Someone like Coffin, who still has the faith, simply cannot reconcile Beroglio with Catholicism. That part we all get. So maybe it can be a first step, once he realizes that a guy parading around in white doesn't make him pope. They were always able to find a way to explain away Wojtyla and Montini, but Bergoglio defies all such attempts at being salvaged.

So Bergoglio is in fact, by being so over the top, exposing the entire conspiracy ... as that one prophecy indicated would happen "about 12 years after the millennium has passed) ... Bergoglio took office in early 2013.

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #12 on:** February 11, 2022, 12:22:48 PM »

Quote from: Matthew on February 11, 2022, 11:59:52 AM

In short, Bennyvacantism is an INDULT phenomenon, and the logical result of the error of having any truck with the Conciliar Church, seeking permission for your birthright which is to attend the Tridentine Mass, nourish your Faith and/or save your soul.

Yep. Pretty much. But, at least it admits that there is a problem to begin with.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #13 on:** February 11, 2022, 12:23:39 PM »

Quote from: DigitalLogos on February 11, 2022, 12:22:48 PM

Yep. Pretty much. But, at least it admits recognition that there is a problem to begin with.

Right, I think it's the beginning of a paradigm shift. He denounces Beroglio's pachamama episode. Has he looked at Assisi yet?

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #14 on:** February 11, 2022, 12:24:47 PM »

Here’s how I would appraise Coffin’s 7 pieces of evidence:

1) Neither here not there;

2) A canonical defect would be “healed in the root” by Francis’s acceptance (Billot);

3) Immaterial;

4) False: He is Cardinal Ratzinger (His Eminence is his proper title);

5) See #2;

6) He is making an argument of fact. What exactly is his argument to support this claim??

7) See #2.

Overall, a very weak list. The only possibility I can see is demonstrating #6 (but nobody in the conciliarists church has made this claim thus far).

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist (Read 5147 times)

Ladislaus

Re: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist

Ladislaus

Re: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist

DigitalLogos

Re: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist

Ladislaus

Re: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist

SeanJohnson

Re: Patrick Coffin goes Bennyvacantist