Orthodoxy has always come across to me as a bit shady (quite aside from their having separated themselves from the unity of the Church) --- it's very hard to get a straight answer from them about matters, it's "this Father of the Church said this", "but this Father of the Church said that", and if you remind them that something is theologically unsound, they just resort to mysticism and all sorts of gobbledygook. They don't draw a strong distinction between Divine Law and canonical discipline, and they use ekonomia to justify deviations even from what would seem to be Divine Law --- second marriages, and now, even contraception. The best I have ever been able to determine, it goes something like "sometimes sin can be tolerated to avoid a greater sin or evil", almost like the priest or bishop is being used as a kind of "sin-eater", or as though the Church, as they see it, can dispense from Divine Law as needed. Totally bogus.
And as to sacramental validity, they will come back and say "we don't view 'validity' as a black-and-white thing, we know more where the Grace of God is, rather than where it is not". Or something like that.
SMH.