| The Amazing Appearance of "Sister Lucy" |
I suspect that the true sister Lúcia was "on stage" together with Paul VI., and can be seen in the RTP video of the event. But then, the false sister Lúcia is inserted into some photos already in 1967.
Paulo VI – Peregrino de Fátima, Video on rtp.pt, 45'00" (https://arquivos.rtp.pt/conteudos/paulo-vi-peregrino-de-fatima/)
RTP = Rádio e Televisão de Portugal
Lol, would that be the “real” Paul VI, or the doppelgänger with the misplaced earlobes?
:popcorn:
.
Not to change the topic, but I couldn't help but notice this one comment under the OP article on the source page:
.
August 15, 2018 at 6:17 AM (http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2018/08/fraud-facial-recognition-technology.html?showComment=1534339051435#c7027808750062521034)
Our Lady would never say "the survivors woujld [would] envy the dead". That is a false apparition from the Novus Ordo and in front of the Novus Ordo empty tabernacle during a Novus Ordo "Eucharistic prayer" from Vatican II Bishop. Like many false apparitions and Novus Ordo carry'ons it is promoted by Bishop Williamson to good folk, perhaps good folk like you. Don't fall for it. It might sound real but the Novus Ordo Church is not the Catholic Church and if they approve an apparition is [it] holds no more water than their approval of the New Mass and various heresies. Stay with Fatima, La Salette, Rue de Bac and all pre-Vatican II approved apparitions and stay away from Bishop Williamson the deceiver and ?Rosicrucian poetry-teller.
.
Somebody has some pretty powerful animosity toward +RW. Almost as if they're ready to blame him for all these problems -- who knows what he's going to be accused of next! Perhaps it's a crypto-Zionist creeping in to do damage by subterfuge, getting even for the unforgivable sin of "anti-Semitism!"
(https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xsgEO8sZ3ho/W4Qtt_mENEI/AAAAAAAABB4/buN7CZAbZcAxJGnv--vz772RBq39D50XQCLcBGAs/s1600/Tampered%2BPhoto%2B-%2BPaul%2BVI%2Band%2BLucy.jpg).
Above 'Lucy's' head I see the mysterious Babuska Lady ... In the photo of the Pope alone, she is by his nose.
St. Therese is also usually depicted as holding a crucifix with roses on/around it. Maybe she was a Rosicrucian too?.
All considered, either Paul VI was moving forward, either walking or on a moving platform, or else the camera was moving to the left, or perhaps BOTH
The image without Lucia was "shot" with a TV camera by an RTP TV cameraman. The other image is a photography shot by a photographer from a slightly different angle..
The press often has a booth with a whole fleet of cameramen and cameras taking pictures at various papal events.
So somebody found a way to insert the figure of a person (the fake Lucy) into the photo before the time of Photoshop, that is, at least before it went public.
There is a copy of the so-called Third Secret that seems to have been altered before the advent of Xerox or computers. It's on the TIA website. Atila Sinke-Guimaraes does an excellent job of unpacking the thing using subtle clues and his superior knowledge of Portuguese. (The letter is handwritten in that language.) But he makes no pretense of looking into the question of HOW the letter could have been faked.
.
Interesting. Could you please provide a link or pertinent keywords for a search on the TIA website?
Thank you very much, Neil Obstat!.
http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2018/08/original-photo-of-meeting-between-paul.html
Now here's a picture of Sister Lucy dated 1949, and this clearly looks like a young Sister Lucy 2.Where did you get these photos?
(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MAi3Huqr9xM/UdVGOBf1gII/AAAAAAAADuY/tBxUTIvbbgA/s1600/lucia-impostor-1949.jpg)
Here's a link to a video showing this picture on the wall at her convent, at 1:10:
http://videos.sapo.pt/K1NFc4fptg5NE5dkLT7k (http://videos.sapo.pt/K1NFc4fptg5NE5dkLT7k)
It is not just a matter of teeth being shaved.
Something else I've been noticing is that the chins may not be as different as I once thought. I'm beginning to think the difference is due to the angle and the added weight. In the picture below, you can see that Sister Lucy 1 has a long chin that protrudes at the bottom. If you add 50 lbs, and take another picture with her head tilted slightly upward, the chin may well look like that of Sister Lucy 2.
(https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/HTimages_g-k/G012_A03_Smiling_2photos.jpg)
The smiles are different, but compare the mouth of Sister Lucy 2 to that of the biological sister I posted yesterday. They look the same. That makes me wonder if there could be another explanation. Notice how flat and short the teeth are in Sister Lucy 2. It looks like they have been filed. Also notice that the gums in both pictures above are larger on the right side (from our view), and extend further down the front right teeth. If Sister Lucy I had her front teeth shaved, the teeth and gums might look very similar to those of Sister Lucy 2. Could this also have something to do with the difference in the smile? I don't know.
It is not just a matter of teeth being shaved.In my opinion, the second photo shows obvious dentures. Lucia's bad teeth were probably extracted and replaced with full dentures as she aged. It's not true that all convents couldn't afford dentures for nuns, many had them. And I think it's extremely likely that they would have popped for dentures for a high-profile nun like Sister Lucy. If the convent couldn't afford them, then I bet it wouldn't have been hard to find a generous devotee of Fatima to donate their cost. I see nothing wrong with that. Also, eyebrows often become paler and sparser as women age. Wild, bushy eyebrows are more common in older men than in women. ETA I also noticed the shiny spot on the gums in the second photo. I have noticed in people who wear dentures that there is a tendency towards reflective spots like that on the imitation gums that don't happen on natural gums.
Look at how the teeth in Lucy 1 are deformed and not coming in straight.
All her teeth most likely needed to be pulled and replaced with dentures to match the picture in Lucy 2.
Convents usually do not have the financial resources to spend on dental bills.
On the other hand, look at the busy eyebrows of Lucy 1 and the barely visible brows on Lucy 2.
This indicates that the two pictures are from two different nuns.
Busy eyebrows usually remain such even in older age.
.Rev. 9:6
Not to change the topic, but I couldn't help but notice this one comment under the OP article on the source page:
.
August 15, 2018 at 6:17 AM (http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2018/08/fraud-facial-recognition-technology.html?showComment=1534339051435#c7027808750062521034)
Our Lady would never say "the survivors woujld [would] envy the dead". That is a false apparition from the Novus Ordo and in front of the Novus Ordo empty tabernacle during a Novus Ordo "Eucharistic prayer" from Vatican II Bishop. Like many false apparitions and Novus Ordo carry'ons it is promoted by Bishop Williamson to good folk, perhaps good folk like you. Don't fall for it. It might sound real but the Novus Ordo Church is not the Catholic Church and if they approve an apparition is [it] holds no more water than their approval of the New Mass and various heresies. Stay with Fatima, La Salette, Rue de Bac and all pre-Vatican II approved apparitions and stay away from Bishop Williamson the deceiver and ?Rosicrucian poetry-teller.
.
Somebody has some pretty powerful animosity toward +RW. Almost as if they're ready to blame him for all these problems -- who knows what he's going to be accused of next! Perhaps it's a crypto-Zionist creeping in to do damage by subterfuge, getting even for the unforgivable sin of "anti-Semitism!"
Imagine the training and brainwashing not to mention years of cooperation this Lucy II must have had.