Besides their conspiracy theories and the fact that they are sedes,.. what specific material on the Dimond brothers' website, www.schismatic-home-aloner.com , do you disagree with concerning the Catholic Church's teachings? Please be specific.
Their conspiracy theories, when fallacious, are self-refuting: such as when they publicly announced that the world would end after the death of John Paul II. They wrote something to the effect that the ensuing conclave would never elect a successor in the modernist anti-Church because the world would be destroyed.
Of course, they deleted all that stuff immediately afterwards... :shocked:
Not that they are sedevacantists, but it is
their version of "sedevacantism" that is to be rejected as pernicious and obscene: it ultimately holds that some high school drop-outs who pretend to be Benedictine and those who agree to their theories are the only "true Catholics" in the world.
If they were just some crazed unschooled heretics with tin-foil habits, that would be problematic enough: but these kids are arrogating to themselves the role of being "representatives" of the anti-modernist Catholic resistance, condemning everyone and everything else,
whilst making money.
Hmm, profiteering from the plight of Catholics: isn't that what the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic synagoga satanae does?But you asked for something specific, so here is one example:
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/why_Mary_is_not_coredeemer.phpThis basically betrays Pete-'n-Mike as false Catholics who interpret
Denzinger and TAN Books (because I doubt they could read Latin and cite their own translations of the original sources) as a Protestant would twist the Sacred Scriptures to fit his heresies. They are bereft of any serious academic formation (let alone a theological formation) and just cite and accommodate those texts that suit their agendae.
It seems that the Dimonds have dared to attack this doctrine of Our Lady in order to placate the Protestants who seem to be the target of their marketing campaign.
All Catholics should eschew the Pete-n'-Mike racketeering fraud as something odious to God and His Holy Church.----------------
The doctrine of Our Lady as Co-Redemptress has been taught by the ordinary magisterium of Holy Church, having as its foundation the teaching of the Fathers regarding the Blessed Virgin Mary as the Second Eve: please consult the following thread:
http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/The-Blessed-Virgin-Mary-the-Second-EveIt must be remembered that the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the Mysteries of the Redemption and in the economy of salvation is absolutely singular and unique: the Divine Maternity to which she had been predestined from all eternity, and all its the concomitant and consequent glories and graces, made her a world unto herself.
The theologians of the 19th century warmly disputed the question pertinent to this discussion, so that in the theological manuals of Fr. Pohle and Fr. Scheeben, one may detect a certain suspicion on the doctrine of Our Lady as Co-Redemptress, found in the writings of Sts. Alphonsus and Louis-Marie, amongst others. This was mostly because these theologians were afraid that a sacerdotal character would be superimposed upon the Blessed Virgin Mary, who never received, nor was capable or receiving, the Sacrament of Holy Orders, as all other women are.
However, since the reign of Pope St. Pius X, who sanctioned the devotion to Our Lady as Co-Redemptress, and with the elucidation of eminent Mariologists following the definition of the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and corporeal Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary and various key Encyclical Letters of the Sovereign Pontiffs and the introduction of new Offices in the Roman Missal and Breviary (e.g., the Immaculate Heart, the Queenship, &c.), the general consensus of the theologians regarding this matter has changed very much.
In his work
The Mother of The Savior and Our Interior Life (Part II, chap. ii., art. 3; trans. Rev. Father Bernard J. Kelley; Dublin: Golden Eagle Books, Ltd., 1948), Rev. Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange expounds upon this matter most lucidly and elegantly, and represents the general consensus of both theologians and the faithful.