Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: On SV  (Read 13968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sneakyticks

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 290
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
On SV
« Reply #195 on: July 10, 2014, 01:43:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Ah, yes, you think you're quite clever, but the answer is, no, I am not sure of this.  Since I can find no Church teaching about this matter, as with all other things, I am relying upon my private judgment and on the application of various Catholic theological principles.  Consequently, I am liable to be mistaken on this point as well.

    It's not about walking through life making a coin-flip or sitting around quivering and incapable of making a decision.  It's simply about being humble and acknowledging our place and acknowledging our own fallibility.

    And that's where most of you SVs get into trouble spiritually, through your absolute refusal to admit that you COULD be wrong.  Although at one point, 2Vermont, you admitted that you did think there was some possibility that you could have gotten something wrong in your analysis.  THAT is what I am talking about.  Mere acknowledgment of this is HUGE.  On the other hand, you see people like Sneaky running around basically foaming at the mouth, an attitude which leads inexorably to dogmatic sedevacantism where you declare as heretics someone who doesn't hold your opinion and you mistake your opinion as having the certainty of faith.  If you are wrong, only a radical intervention from the Mercy of God can ever correct your error.  So you are in great peril.


    This guy is unbelievable.

    He says here that:

    A- He can find no Church teaching supporting his "position",
    B- He is relying upon his own private judgment,
    C- Applies various Catholic theological principles, when in fact he REJECTS various Catholic theological principles, such as, you don't go against the common/universal teaching of theologians (which is why he rejects BoD/BoB, I.I., manifest public heretics are ipso facto excommunicated without any declaration etc.),
    D- Is liable to be mistaken on this point as well.
    E- And to top it off calls all this "being humble and acknowledging our place and acknowledging our own fallibility."

    Well you bet you are mistaken!

    But then he dares to say that SV's "get into trouble spiritually through their absolute refusal to admit that they COULD be wrong", because SV's:

    A- Find dozens of Church teaching supporting SV,
    B- Rely on what the Popes, Saints, Doctors and theologians have said,
    C- CORRECTLY apply various Catholic theological principles, as opposed to Lad here and non-SV who REJECT them.
    D- Have no patience for silly and made-up arguments that go against Catholic teaching and principles.

    Outrageous.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #196 on: July 10, 2014, 01:48:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sneakyticks
    He can find no Church teaching supporting his "position",


    Neither can you.  Theologians have dealt with the subject of possible SV, but the Church has not pronounced on the matter.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #197 on: July 10, 2014, 01:53:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm done posting on the subject.  You may carry on foaming at the mouth without me.  I am very happy and at peace in my position; I allow God to lead me where He wants to and put all my trust in Him and not in my own private judgment.  I have charity in my heart for all people, without exception, including for Jorge Bergoglio.  God loves him too and deeply desires his salvation.  If he has lost the faith, then I sincerely pray for his conversion.  Similarly for anyone else who might be in error, including yourself.  Peace.

    I am more drawn to the (at least natural) kindness of a Jorge Bergoglio than I am to the dark bitter zeal exhibited by most sedevacantists.  If you read the Gospels, Our Lord reserved His harshes words for the Pharisees, who were by all accounts orthodox in their beliefs but lacked charity, and He spoke gently to heretics like the Sadducees.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #198 on: July 10, 2014, 02:02:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Every single day, I pray to Our Lord and Our Blessed Mother, something along the lines of "Please teach me the truth and help me always remain a Catholic pleasing to you."  I have more confidence in that prayer than I do in my own judgment and man-made syllogisms.

    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #199 on: July 10, 2014, 02:20:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Sneakyticks
    He can find no Church teaching supporting his "position",


    Neither can you.


    This is a plain LIE.

    Do you know what the 8th Commandment is?

    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Theologians have dealt with the subject of possible SV, but the Church has not pronounced on the matter.


    The COMMON TEACHING, and the MAJORITY one, backed up by Popes, Doctors and Saints even, is what SV's believe in and hold.

    But since you are a heretic who rejects the common teaching of theologians anyways, this isn't enough for you.


    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    On SV
    « Reply #200 on: July 10, 2014, 02:23:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Charity is to be preferred before all gifts.

    Quote

    [1] If I speak with the tongues of men, and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. [2] And if I should have prophecy and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. [3] And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing. [4] Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; [5] Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #201 on: July 10, 2014, 02:29:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    I'm done posting on the subject.  You may carry on foaming at the mouth without me.


    Yes, run away.

    You proved you can't even answer simple questions against your concocted position.

    Quote from: Ladislaus
    I am very happy and at peace in my position; I allow God to lead me where He wants to and put all my trust in Him and not in my own private judgment.


    So does any Protestant and Novus Ordite believe.





    Offline LuAnne

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 15
    • Reputation: +25/-0
    • Gender: Female
    On SV
    « Reply #202 on: July 10, 2014, 04:15:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ladislaus - Please explain why Vatican 2 claimants as Vicars of Christ have not taken the Papal Oath.    http://www.dailycatholic.org/papaoath.htm  

    Legitimate popes bless their predecessors.  They never contradict nor give new interpretations to what Pontiffs have declared as dogma and doctrine.  Do you agree, Ladislaus?

    Sedevacantists do not muddy and confuse Sacred Tradition.  Sedevacantists defend the Total Deposit of Faith, Ladislaus, without exception!


    Offline LuAnne

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 15
    • Reputation: +25/-0
    • Gender: Female
    On SV
    « Reply #203 on: July 10, 2014, 04:19:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition", warned Pope Leo XIII in 1896 (Encyclical Satis Cognitum, par. 9).

    And Pope Benedict XV also made clear: "Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected" (Encyclical Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, par. 24).

    Offline Histrionics

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 80
    • Reputation: +75/-1
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #204 on: July 10, 2014, 04:32:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sneakyticks it perhaps wouldn't hurt to reevaluate your approach; self-assurance in your convictions is one thing, however the entrenched bitterness is another altogether, one likely to push people away from your position regardless of whether or not the truth is on your side.

    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #205 on: July 10, 2014, 05:08:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Histrionics
    Sneakyticks it perhaps wouldn't hurt to reevaluate your approach; self-assurance in your convictions is one thing, however the entrenched bitterness is another altogether, one likely to push people away from your position regardless of whether or not the truth is on your side.


    You're right.

    I have behaved heinously and I promise I will never do it again.

    I apologize to Ladislaus and Cantarella and everyone else.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #206 on: July 10, 2014, 05:30:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sneakyticks
    I apologize to Ladislaus and Cantarella and everyone else.


    Not a problem, Sneakyticks.  I'm not easily offended.  I just stopped posting because I didn't feel that it was a productive use of my time.  It wasn't really going anywhere.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #207 on: July 10, 2014, 05:33:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LuAnne
    Ladislaus - Please explain why Vatican 2 claimants as Vicars of Christ have not taken the Papal Oath.    http://www.dailycatholic.org/papaoath.htm


    Well, I can't say.  I can't read their minds.  I have my suspicions, and my suspicions are that the V2 Popes could very well have been infiltrators and sworn enemies of the Catholic Church.  But I really couldn't say for sure.

    Quote
    Legitimate popes bless their predecessors.  They never contradict nor give new interpretations to what Pontiffs have declared as dogma and doctrine.  Do you agree, Ladislaus?

    Sedevacantists do not muddy and confuse Sacred Tradition.  Sedevacantists defend the Total Deposit of Faith, Ladislaus, without exception!


    Again, like Sneakyticks, you seem to confuse me with someone who holds the R&R position.  I do not.  So I'm not sure where this is going.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46813
    • Reputation: +27672/-5138
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #208 on: July 10, 2014, 05:34:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LuAnne
    "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition", warned Pope Leo XIII in 1896 (Encyclical Satis Cognitum, par. 9).

    And Pope Benedict XV also made clear: "Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected" (Encyclical Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, par. 24).


    Right.  I understand that it only takes one heresy.  Which heresy does Jorge Bergoglio hold?

    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    On SV
    « Reply #209 on: July 10, 2014, 05:57:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Sneakyticks
    I apologize to Ladislaus and Cantarella and everyone else.


    Not a problem, Sneakyticks.  I'm not easily offended.  I just stopped posting because I didn't feel that it was a productive use of my time.  It wasn't really going anywhere.



    I really do mean it, I'm sorry.