Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: On board with antipope talk.  (Read 3272 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaramieHirsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Reputation: +956/-248
  • Gender: Male
    • h
On board with antipope talk.
« on: September 25, 2015, 06:51:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • So, I'm going insane.

    But...the facts are presenting themselves.

    Never thought I'd be stating something like this.  But I really don't think he is legitimate.  I guess Pope "Emeritus" Benedict XVI is still pope?





    Logged
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #1 on: September 25, 2015, 07:00:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • In all fairness, we should try to refrain from over-focusing on the status of the Pope.  Clearly there are so many issues and they have been front and center since Vatican II.  Insiders saw some of these issues forming before Vatican II.  Our job is to pray daily, have access to the Sacraments and live a Catholic life.  

    However, I get the fact that it is exciting and a real rush to contemplate these issues.  

    Whatever side you eventually embrace, or keep embracing, a soul cannot be saved without prayer.  

    Logged

    Offline Croix de Fer

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3219
    • Reputation: +2525/-2210
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #2 on: September 25, 2015, 09:12:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    I guess Pope "Emeritus" Benedict XVI is still pope?


    Not really. The Church hasn't had a legitimate pope since Pope Pius XII.

    Since 1958, materially? Yes.  Formally (legitimate)? No.

    Conclusion: False shepherds since 1958.

    Similar to a person suffering Alzheimer's disease. Materially, the person occupies his body, but mentally and spiritually, he is vastly skewed, hence he's not the same person.

    The cure for this terminal disease which will wholly restore the papacy? Conversion to the Catholic Faith and promulgation of the Tridentine Latin Mass as the primary Mass in the Latin Rite, while allowing other Latin Rite liturgies that predated Quo Primum by 200 years, and rescinding Vatican II Council and the Novus Ordo mass.
    Logged
    Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. ~ Psalms 143:1 (Douay-Rheims)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #3 on: September 25, 2015, 09:14:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    But I really don't think he is legitimate.  I guess Pope "Emeritus" Benedict XVI is still pope?


    Even if Bergoglio's election were invalid, Benedict resigned.  Consequently the See would be vacant.
    Logged

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #4 on: September 25, 2015, 09:16:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&s=attach&id=6092

    Pope Francis giving the illuminati hand sign at the start of his speech
    before congress yesterday.
    The same afternoon in which the Democrats in the senate voted
    against outlawing late term abortions.
    Logged

    Offline Croagh Patrick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 100
    • Reputation: +99/-1
    • Gender: Male
    • Could you not watch one hour with me.
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #5 on: September 25, 2015, 09:26:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #6 on: September 25, 2015, 09:34:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
    Pope Francis giving the illuminati hand sign at the start of his speech before congress yesterday.


    It's also a 666.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #7 on: September 25, 2015, 09:38:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Ann Barnhardt has taken this position.

    http://www.barnhardt.biz/
    Logged

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4622/-480
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #8 on: September 25, 2015, 09:53:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    But I really don't think he is legitimate.  I guess Pope "Emeritus" Benedict XVI is still pope?


    Even if Bergoglio's election were invalid, Benedict resigned.  Consequently the See would be vacant.


    I thought the theory was that Ratzinger's resignation was invalid because he was "pressured" into it.  I'm not a resignationist, but I'm pretty sure that's what I heard.

    P.S.  What is it about Ann Barnhardt that so many traditional Catholics like?
    Logged

    Offline Brennus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 132
    • Reputation: +72/-12
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #9 on: September 25, 2015, 01:00:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    •  
    P.S.  What is it about Ann Barnhardt that so many traditional Catholics like?[/quote]


    She writes well. She discovers some nasty topics that don't get enough reporting, mainly the core nature of Mahometanism and Obama's creepy background in Chicago. Her writing on theological topics is often original and not bad, for a convert.

    I used to wonder if she was, perhaps, some sort of disinformation operation, but I am inclined to think she is authentic. I like her.  Now, here is what is wrong with her:

    She seems to appeal to those with a taint of Americanism in them. She can't see the inherent flaws in the U.S. Constitution that contributed to the current crisis and believes that, after an inevitable cινιℓ ωαr, the old republic will be restored with a few improvements. – sort of like Star Wars.

    She never mentions the Jєωs and their role in the attack on Christendom. In fact, reportedly, if you ask her about this, she will rip your head off.  I find that odd.

    Watch her video on the Vendee.

    Logged

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #10 on: September 25, 2015, 01:42:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Notice in his address to congress, there is not even a slight mention of Our Lord Jesus Christ. How interesting that it was Moses instead who was mentioned, Moses, who the Jєωs are very fond of. Probably to avoid hurting Jєωιѕн sensibilities, the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ is strategically dropped.

    Another ones who were mentioned were the leftist Catholic activist, Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker Movement; and the humanitarian, black "Civil Rights" leader, Martin Luther King. Reminds me why I don't want to know what Pope Francis is pontificating anywhere, giving just the right ammunition to the Marxist -progressives who want to destroy the Church from within. Too depressing. But I still have faith, that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it".
    Logged
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #11 on: September 25, 2015, 02:29:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Barnhardt is a shill for the Jєωs. Wouldn't be surprised if she is a Jєω.

    http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/citizens/ann_barnhardt_the_boston.php
    Logged
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #12 on: September 25, 2015, 02:31:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Cantarella
    Notice in his address to congress, there is not even a slight mention of Our Lord Jesus Christ. How interesting that it was Moses instead who was mentioned, Moses, who the Jєωs are very fond of. Probably to avoid hurting Jєωιѕн sensibilities, the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ is strategically dropped.


    You need to remember that Rabbi Bergoglio was addressing the American Knesset Congress, which is filled with zionist-enabling "evangelical" scuм.
    Logged
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Ursus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +137/-2
    • Gender: Male
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #13 on: September 25, 2015, 04:42:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Cantarella
    Notice in his address to congress, there is not even a slight mention of Our Lord Jesus Christ. How interesting that it was Moses instead who was mentioned, Moses, who the Jєωs are very fond of. Probably to avoid hurting Jєωιѕн sensibilities, the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ is strategically dropped.

    Another ones who were mentioned were the leftist Catholic activist, Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker Movement; and the humanitarian, black "Civil Rights" leader, Martin Luther King. Reminds me why I don't want to know what Pope Francis is pontificating anywhere, giving just the right ammunition to the Marxist -progressives who want to destroy the Church from within. Too depressing. But I still have faith, that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it".


    Just read the transcript. You're right and its disturbing. Who's church does he run?
    Logged

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    On board with antipope talk.
    « Reply #14 on: September 25, 2015, 04:53:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Many of MLK FBI dossiers have been sealed by Court Order to 2029.

    I guess by 2029 the country will be so decadent and communist that
    it would make no difference at all.

    Gosh, we know everything about Al Capone since be went to Federal
    prison in 1932.
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »