could it be that someone(s) want to get rid of him because he is hard on the case of Fr. Wiest and his public history as a priest?
You ask if Father Starbuck may have been "hard on the case of . . ." a person who may or may not be a priest.
Please keep in mind the following:
For well over a year, members of the chapel went to confession to, received Holy Communion from and entertained in our homes a man who, according to public records, was a known pedophile who had been told that in order to keep his Novus Ordo retirement money he had to agree to be laicized, to never present himself as a priest, and to never again say Mass in public.
Even after the local Bishop notified chapel members of this horrendous situation, Father Perez did nothing. It was Father Starbuck who obtained the legal facts and told us from the pulpit that Father Colletti was leaving and chapel members would be wise to keep their children away from him. At another Mass on the same day, Father Perez covered up for the predator and said from the pulpit that "Father Colletti had been CALLED BACK to his diocese." This is an lie by omission. Thank God for Father Starbuck.
Let us briefly mention the fake nun who Father Perez asked Father Starbuck to take care of, and the fake Pfeiffer priest who the chapel members told Father Perez to get rid of.
Fast forward to January 2021. "Fr." Wiest shows up and claims he met Father Perez 30 years ago in Rome when he was a young seminarian and had nowhere to stay and Father Perez put him up for a period of time. Then he changed his story from Rome to a small town outside of Florence and said he and three other seminarians decided to go to Slovakia and on the way they stopped at Christ the King Seminary and Father Perez allowed them to spend ONE night. The town is 30 minutes East of Florence and NOT on the way to Slovakia. Why did Wiest change his story? He contradicted himself publicly from the pulpit.
He also contradicted himself publicly from the pulpit when he said he was 48 no 58.
He also contradicted himself publicly from the pulpit when he said he had testicular cancer in his last year of high school and recovered completely. Then he said he had testicular cancer in his last year of law school at Yale and recovered completely. These conflicting stories were recorded.
Then he requested to work with altar boys alone, unlike the other priests who are cautious and always invite the adult altar servers and home-school mothers or parents to attend, and are careful to avoid being alone with any minor child.
At this point it was discovered that no such person as Father Michael Wiest had ever existed. Since state law requires that any adult who works with children must submit their fingerprints and drivers license to the state to send on to the DOJ, this was requested of him and he adamantly refused.
Soon after that, Father Perez asked Father Starbuck to take up the problem with the four persons on the school board and Father did as he had been instructed and three of the four members had a conniption fit.
Not content to simply follow the law and protect our children, the school board and Wiest set out to destroy Father Starbuck.
It does not make sense, just as the Great Covid Reset does not make sense. Both the micro problem and the macro problem ONLY make sense when we realize that evil is involved.
Please join us in saying the 54-day Rosary to Our Lady of the Rosary for the protection and guidance of Father Starbuck and for the rot to be rooted out of the chapel. Our official start date was the Feast of the Circuмcision, but if you have not yet joined us, please consider doing so.
Father Starbuck now has Masses elsewhere, two Masses on Sundays with standing room only and this week also Thursday, first Friday and first Saturday.
Topic: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon (Read 57688 times)