Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon  (Read 65587 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon
« Reply #350 on: February 15, 2022, 05:59:07 PM »
This statement is not true.  While I absolutely do not support these schismatic Old Catholics, we cannot spread falsehoods. 

This "Abbate" did not ordain nor consecrate Schweikert.  Schweikert was consecrated by Sigismund Vipartas (consecrated by Carfora), thus he would have had valid (but schismatic) orders through the Old Catholics.

Schweikert did not accept Abbate as having valid orders. 
Schweikert was correct in not accepting Abbate as having valid orders, seeing that Abbate was deluded into believed that he was "ordained" by Jesus after He (Jesus) walked into Abbate's barber shop and sat down in Abbate's barber chair. Abbate had no actual ordination, so of course Schweikert could not accept Abbate as having a valid ordination.

Schweikert did not allow his doubts regarding whether or not Abbate was a priest or a lunatic interfere with his decision to take over Abbate's cult and the financial control that went with it.

It is known that Schweikert was ordained several times, leading some to believe that one of those unexplained ordinations was by Abbate when he chose Schweikert to take over control of the cult (who believed that Abbate was told by Jesus that he was first born on Mars, then died and was reincarnated, but continued to travel back to Mars periodically.) Abbate was repeatedly ruled insane and incarcerated, he also repeatedly raped teen-age girls who had joined his order of pseudo-nuns.


Re: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon
« Reply #351 on: February 25, 2022, 12:54:17 PM »


Don't know if its true or not (correct me if I'm wrong), but the last word I've heard is that Wiest has been asked to leave by the OLHC board and he refuses to do so.  I understands he continues to stay at a place that is funded by OLHC faithful (Our money!). At this point, he is basically a shamed fraud/con man who is hunkered down in a place like a criminal on the run!

A triumphant victory for our dear Father Starbuck who was a victim and was abused by Wiest with the evil blessings of "the board" at OLHC.  A fraud has been perpetrated and Wiest and "the board" (particularly the individual who banged on the door terrorizing Father while he was in the confessional that Sunday morning should be penalized for their actions!).  There should be just consequences paid by Wiest, the Board and this despicable individual!  Wiest should not be given the chance of simply fleeing!  I believe the fraud he committed was is in some way a criminal act! Does anyone here have any further information or development about Wiest?


Re: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon
« Reply #352 on: February 27, 2022, 03:48:46 AM »

If anyone feels that the Holy Ghost might prompt them accordingly, Father Starbuck is in need of a Baptismal Font!  I found one on Ebay for his new chapel at St. Dominics!   Father has not directed me to do this, but I thought I might try and surprise Father by asking those here who believe in Father's devotion/cause of saying the TLM (pre-1962 Missal) to please contribute in buying this beautiful used traditional Baptismal Font on Ebay!

As I said before, Father has many new expenses for St. Dominics and Father is struggling to keep up with the many ever-growing financial demands that he is trying to handle all by himself!  So, if you find it in your heart, continue to please generously help Father on Sundays as much as you can .  I will post a photo of the used Baptismal Font tomorrow.  It cost's $1,600 plus shipping and it is beautiful!

Checks MUST be made out to:
"Father Cedrik Starbuck"    NOT St. Dominic's Chapel.
P.O.B. 427
Tustin, CA 92781

Let's all (with God's abundant grace on Father) make St. Dominic's Chapel a beautiful example and success for the world to see in which we will be awarded by God for our devotion to Father Starbuck, the TLM (pre-1962 Missal!) and Our Blessed Mother!

God bless you all

Offline Meg

Re: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon
« Reply #353 on: February 27, 2022, 11:38:59 AM »
I'm still troubled by the situation of the old nun who died, presumably of starvation, who had sought help from your chapel. Didn't Fr. Starbuck refuse to let her onto chapel property? I don't think that was ever really explained. Though maybe there's a reasonable explanation. 

Re: OLHC laypersons attempting to take over chapel CENSOR Fr. Starbuck's sermon
« Reply #354 on: February 27, 2022, 07:50:34 PM »
I'm still troubled by the situation of the old nun who died, presumably of starvation, who had sought help from your chapel. Didn't Fr. Starbuck refuse to let her onto chapel property? I don't think that was ever really explained. Though maybe there's a reasonable explanation.
I would like to know what happened to the nun's body. Was she decently buried? Is the body still lying unclaimed in the morgue?  Where did she die?