Certainly, Fr. Starbuck gave a talk last Sunday at the 7:30am Mass at OLHC. A talk that stated a number of truths, but was most certainly one that exhibited a lack of charity and wisdom and scandal. Yes, our beloved Monsignor Perez could have done a better and/or more open job of vetting previous priests that were here. It was an unfortunate lack of judgment. However, what Fr. Starbuck said would have been more appropriate in a meeting with the lay board and, most certainly, the discussion of Fr. Wiest. This discussion of an individual in the public is unwise, uncharitable and is not what one would expect from an aspiring pastor.
Due to this serious lack of charity and wisdom and desire to "bring his case" before the public of OLHC, it was certainly wise to refrain from a wider distribution of this scandalous behavior and, therefore, the request to not give the "sermon" at the 10:00 am Mass. Again, the talk, which again, would have been better in a private meeting with the board has shaken some people's faith and caused dissension. Was this the goal?
What was the reason to bring that discussion to the broader forum like this? So people could talk about something they do not fully know or understand while partisans of one side or the other sally forth into battle while others egg them on? All this shows is a distinct lack of charity, wisdom and, moreover, a love of scandal. Whoever these people are they want to talk about the board as "money grubbing" and "power hungry" without giving thought or care for the years that the board and their families have put into this Chapel along with Fr. Schell and Fr. Perez. What "power" and what "money" could they expect to obtain? All they were trying to do with their priests was to establish an oasis of the Catholic Faith for their families, themselves and others. The calumny hurled at them is shameful and those responsible should repent of their actions.
Is a board in a Catholic parish optimal? No, it is not but we do not live in normal times and there are very sound reasons that Fr. Schell created it and Fr. Perez supported it. Very strong reasons. Additionally, to name an individual of the parish by name, Joel Iddings, and to lie and spread lies about him is terrible and shameful. Are those people doing that, also work as hard as he does to support the chapel? Do they support the school and do all the time consuming things that he does to keep the chapel going? He is a most charitable man and well-respected. I have been at the Chapel since 2005 and I have known Fr. Starbuck since he came. I do not wish to speak ill of any priest, but Fr. Starbuck is not a martyr. And, again, to put this whole matter in a public forum like this or any forum is scandalous and slanderous. I hope those that are doing it are satisfied with what they have caused.
Are there problems at every chapel, yes. People are people and none of us are perfect. However, to discuss a serious matter like this seems more like politicking and trying to win points instead of prayerfully, charitably and wisely seeking a solution. May the Lord have mercy on our souls and may our Lord grant grace to our chapel and may it continue to be an oasis of the Catholic Faith as Fr. Schell and Fr. Perez wanted.