Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism  (Read 6874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism
« Reply #120 on: May 26, 2026, 01:42:19 PM »
We agree on this ha ha! This Laz guy is a total dogmatic sede - who has a very serious reading comprehension problem. What a combination. :facepalm:
You are a liar and a hypocrite. I believe in St Thomas Aquinas' teachings and you called my beliefs "crap".

Are you so mentally addled that basic syllogisms are beyond your science?

Again, thank you for exposing yourself. You and Tom do great works for God, He will surely reward your efforts.


Re: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism
« Reply #121 on: May 26, 2026, 01:48:31 PM »
You are a liar and a hypocrite. I believe in St Thomas Aquinas' teachings and you called my beliefs "crap".

Are you so mentally addled that basic syllogisms are beyond your science?

Again, thank you for exposing yourself. You and Tom do great works for God, He will surely reward your efforts.
You really need help Lazarus


Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism
« Reply #122 on: May 26, 2026, 01:49:06 PM »
You are a liar and a hypocrite. I believe in St Thomas Aquinas's teachings and you called my beliefs "crap".

Are you so mentally addled that basic syllogisms are beyond your science?

Again, thank you for exposing yourself.
Well, since you mentioned it, your beliefs are crap and cannot be compared in any way to St. Thomas', who never taught what you accuse him of teaching.

As i said, you have a very serious reading comprehension problem. You're very consistent in that you read meanings into words which the words do not say while you fail to avert to what the words do say.

Do yourself a huge favor and always remember and apply the Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man."

Re: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism
« Reply #123 on: May 26, 2026, 02:00:21 PM »
Well, since you mentioned it, your beliefs are crap and cannot be compared in any way to St. Thomas', who never taught what you accuse him of teaching.

As i said, you have a very serious reading comprehension problem. You're very consistent in that you read meanings into words which the words do not say while you fail to avert to what the words do say.

Do yourself a huge favor and always remember and apply the Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man."
Refusing to answer basic theological statements then claiming I lack reading comprehension skills is very strange.  

"Omnis conscientia, sive recta, sive erronea, sive in per se malis, sive in indifferentibus, est obligatoria; ita quod qui contra conscientiam facit, peccat."

“Every conscience, whether right or erroneous, whether concerning things evil in themselves or things indifferent, is obligatory, so that he who acts against conscience sins.”

You must have a very good reason to disobey a Church Doctor. Let's hear it out and see if it is Catholic. 

Offline St Giles

  • Supporter
Re: O.L. Jesus Christ does not make things complicated - Sedevacantism
« Reply #124 on: May 26, 2026, 02:09:22 PM »

You treat Bp Lefebvre as if he were infallible. When presented with a counter-argument, you default to non-answers based on the strawman you and the "Resistance" invented on your competitors. You do not obey God. You obey THE GHOST OF Bp Lefebvre.
 
I don't think God would leave His Church entirely abandoned without a shepherd. ABL was best qualified to set a direction for the path forward in this crisis. He demonstrated a great love of Church law and obedience & respect for the hierarchy, but he also knew where to draw the line, both in how far to obey, and to what extent he can make his own judgments. He was one of the most traditional bishops who acted accordingly.

It would be interesting to know what he would do if he lived to see Benefice XVI & Francis. Would he keep waiting for their conversion? Would he clearly demonstrate to each their errors while pointing out the bad fruits? Would he consider uniting the trad clergy for an imperfect general council?