CathInfo.com

Then why did Tom and Stubborn call it a mental illness that infects me?

Why do they act like rabid dogs when in front of what they think is a "dogmatic sede", not treating me like a brother in Christ at all?

Why do you not rebuke them when they commit evil in front of you?

Do you take God's Justice for a joke? Do you think that in front of the Creator, you will be able to stand proudly and claim you did not sin during this conversation either through action, thoughts, or inaction?

When has Traditional Catholicism become infected by such indifferentism? Since when do Catholics have the audacity to pretend to be from God, yet to act as though His words were meaningless? Since when have Catholics become so infatuated with themselves that they think just having the true faith is enough and that they could live their lives without applying the true faith?

Who taught those people?

You don’t know history.  And you don’t know anything about the new mass.  +ABL told seminarians in the 70s/early 80s that if they could find a true priest (and there were many alive at the time) and he said the new mass using the most conservative canon, with the full offertory that they could go.  Why?  Because the new mass has multiple options on how to say it.  One early canon option (in the 70s) is nearly identical to the true rite. 

I don’t agree with +ABL’s advice to go, (the new mass, even if valid is still sinful due to illicitness), but he was correct as far as the validity argument. 

Life is not simple and this crisis isn’t either.