CathInfo.com

The Sedeprivationists: This group is made up of those who have adopted a position that could be qualified as an intermediary, namely that the current occupants of the See of Peter were indeed legally elected as successors of Peter but, because of their manifest heresies, they are radically deprived of any authority in the Church of God. Wanting to safeguard the infallibility and indefectibility of the Catholic Church, but also the perpetuity of apostolic succession, they adopted a position which seemed to them to reconcile the two elements. According to them, therefore, there is someone who is elected to occupy the post of pope, and he materially continues the apostolic succession, so that no one can be elected in his place for the moment to occupy the post of bishop of Rome, but this character is deprived of the authority of God to lead the Church due to a failure in acceptance: the chosen one does not intend to seek the common good of the Church, and his acceptance is not valid. While the supporters of the "Recognise and Resist" position (the sedeplenists) believe in filtering what the conciliar popes say, accepting what is in conformity with the Faith and rejecting what is contrary to the Faith, the sedeprivationists believe useless to filter, but obstinately turn a deaf ear to what the conciliar popes preach, whether it is in accordance with the faith or not, as long as the latter have not returned to the whole Faith. They consider modern popes "to be unworthy of being obeyed, since they are heretics." Their nullam partem with the Conciliar Church is absolute, but they do not exclude the possibility that a conciliar pope will convert and be thereby invested with the authority of God, the obstacle to this investiture being lifted.

Considering his excellency Lefebvre's personality and beliefs , it is likely that after Pachamama's worship he would have declared publicly that the seat was vacant.

You cling to a ghost without caring about whether he would still have the same position today.