Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: RomanCatholic1953 on December 21, 2019, 09:46:49 PM
-
Elderly Nun in Traditional Habit exposes Francis one world Religion schemes in 2020
7 Minute Video
https://youtu.be/iZx4fYtSuYs
-
The video posted in the OP only provides a little less than three minutes of Mother Miriam's talk. The rest of the video is a commentary by an anti-Catholic Protestant.
Here's the entire video of Mother Miriam. It was originally posted by Life Site news. It's almost an hour long:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8E-5p3DdUc
-
It’s the rise of the false right:
Vigano, nobody nuns, Schneider, Burke, etc.
All denouncing the conciliar subversion of the Church, but all committed to the same conciliar apparatus.
Create the illusion of resistance, to trap those who might have resisted.
-
It’s the rise of the false right:
Vigano, nobody nuns, Schneider, Burke, etc.
All denouncing the conciliar subversion of the Church, but all committed to the same conciliar apparatus.
Create the illusion of resistance, to trap those who might have resisted.
So you believe that everyone in the conciliar church who are expressing concern about Francis are doing so because they are intent on trapping anyone who might resist?
-
So you believe that everyone in the conciliar church who are expressing concern about Francis are doing so because they are intent on trapping anyone who might resist?
I believe those I named are doing so.
They decry the consequences of the principles they never question.
That requires a rather remarkable CRIME THINK ability.
And I believe Francis (bad cop) approves of them (good cops).
-
I believe those I named are doing so.
They decry the consequences of the principles they never question.
That requires a rather remarkable CRIME THINK ability.
And I believe Francis (bad cop) approves of them (good cops).
You are entitled to your opinion, of course, but you named Vigano too.
And yet Fr. Trincado, who is a Resistance priest, recently posted Ap. Vigano's latest writing on his website, "Non-Possumus." He has not disqualified Vigano, as you have. So I have to think that Fr. Trincado, at least, doesn't share your view.
-
You are entitled to your opinion, of course, but you named Vigano too.
And yet Fr. Trincado, who is a Resistance priest, recently posted Ap. Vigano's latest writing on his website, "Non-Possumus." He has not disqualified Vigano, as you have. So I have to think that Fr. Trincado, at least, doesn't share your view.
You and Sean have hit on an interesting contradiction.
Sean stands behind +W's position that there are "some" graces emanating from within the Consiliar church,
It would seem Mother Mary can intervene to provide graces in spite of the Consiliar Church.
But why is Sean not buying Mother Miriam? Perhaps because she's not promoting tradition and the Tridentine Mass?
Maybe because he thinks the Brooklyn jewess is a marrano? And there are many Jєωιѕн converts who are.
My opinion is that EWTN is full of them.
I listened to Mother Miriam's radio talk and was impressed by her calm, intelligent delivery.
She dissected Francis's "new humanism" as good as any trad.
I would have to study her material more to see if there were any red flags. For example, if she supports Israel.
-
There are likely to be red flags with Mother Miriam. It seems unlikely that she sees the entirety of the situation. But that doesn't mean that she is not sincere. That my point.
Burke and Schneider have some serious flaws in their view of the problems in the Church - I don't pay much attention to them anymore, and Sean is probably right about the good cop/bad cop, at least when it comes to Burke/Schneider. But I don't think that they are all compromised. I'm sure there are problems with Vigano too. But...he sounds a lot like +ABL in his latest writing, posted on the Non-Possumus blog (at least on first perusal). Vigano's perception of the problem may at least be a little more clear than others. Though I have no idea what his views are on the Old Mass, and older devotions.
-
There are likely to be red flags with Mother Miriam. It seems unlikely that she sees the entirety of the situation. But that doesn't mean that she is not sincere. That my point.
Burke and Schneider have some serious flaws in their view of the problems in the Church - I don't pay much attention to them anymore, and Sean is probably right about the good cop/bad cop, at least when it comes to Burke/Schneider. But I don't think that they are all compromised. I'm sure there are problems with Vigano too. But...he sounds a lot like +ABL in his latest writing, posted on the Non-Possumus blog (at least on first perusal). Vigano's perception of the problem may at least be a little more clear than others. Though I have no idea what his views are on the Old Mass, and older devotions.
He says the new Mass, abides by the new CIC, dispenses only the new sacraments, is himself consecrated in the new Rite, and NEVER says Archbishop Lefebvre was right (or even defends him).
Ps: Fr. Trincado is not the blogmaster of Non Possumus. He exercises only a consultative role on that blog, at the invitation of its owner. As regards the Vigano article, I did not bother to read it. I have no time for conciliarists committed to conciliarism, opposing other conciliarists. That’s like arguing the merits of republicans vs Democrats (or vice-versa): All liberals.
-
He says the new Mass, abides by the new CIC, dispenses only the new sacraments, is himself consecrated in the new Rite, and NEVER says Archbishop Lefebvre was right (or even defends him).
Ps: Fr. Trincado is not the blogmaster of Non Possumus. He exercises only a consultative role on that blog, at the invitation of its owner.
Then why did the blog owner of non-possumus post Vigano's article in a favorable light? Is the owner of Non-Possumus a Novus Ordo Catholic? He must be, if he posted something that you don't like, right?
Or maybe the owner of Non-Possumus is really an infiltrator who is trying to keep everyone from resisting the errors of Rome. Could that be it?
-
Then why did the blog owner of non-possumus post Vigano's article in a favorable light? Is the owner of Non-Possumus a Novus Ordo Catholic? He must be, if he posted something that you don't like, right?
Or maybe the owner of Non-Possumus is really an infiltrator who is really trying to keep everyone from resisting the errors of Rome. Could that be it?
(See updated post above)
Are you trying to make enemies for me?
I am quite sure the blogmaster was merely pointing out the accusations against Francis, not holding out Vigano as a champion of orthodoxy (as you seem to want to interpret the appearance of the article on that blog).
On the other hand, my posts here are intended to prevent deluded souls from forming the conclusions you have formed.
Consequently, there is no conflict really between NP and I, but between you and I😀.
-
(See updated post above)
Are you trying to make enemies for me?
I am quite sure the blogmaster was merely pointing out the accusations against Francis, not holding out Vigano as a champion of orthodoxy (as you seem to want to interpret the appearance of the article on that blog).
On the other hand, my posts here are intended to prevent deluded souls from forming the conclusions you have formed.
Consequently, there is no conflict really between NP and I, but between you and I😀.
I never said anything about Vigano being a champion of orthodoxy. But his article was posted in a favorable light on the Non-Possumus blog. And his article reminds me of +ABL. Vigano wrote a good assessment of the situation. You don't want anyone to acknowledge that. Fine. No one is allowed to say anything about the bad things that Francis is doing unless they have your approval that they are legitimate. Otherwise they have a bad intent. Got it.
-
I never said anything about Vigano being a champion of orthodoxy. But his article was posted in a favorable light on the Non-Possumus blog. And his article reminds me of +ABL. Vigano wrote a good assessment of the situation. You don't want anyone to acknowledge that. Fine. No one is allowed to say anything about the bad things that Francis is doing unless they have your approval that they are legitimate. Otherwise they have a bad intent. Got it.
That’s what I get for arguing with a woman.
-
I listened to Mother Miriam's radio talk and was impressed by her calm, intelligent delivery.
She dissected Francis's "new humanism" as good as any trad.
I would have to study her material more to see if there were any red flags. For example, if she supports Israel.
She is connected with the Association of Hebrew Catholics which is a huge red flag. This organization promotes various problematic ideas, such as celebration of Jєωιѕн holy days.
-
More on Francis
☾ Retweeted
(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/85156698/Bild_2_normal.png) (https://twitter.com/gloriatv)
(https://twitter.com/gloriatv)
gloria.tv @gloriatv
(https://twitter.com/gloriatv)
Francis Asked Football Manager Not To Make Sign Of The Cross (Video) https://gloria.tv/post/X4gCBStAGUz211JVtiJztoAUD … (https://t.co/pP6jbuTedb)
(https://t.co/pP6jbuTedb) (https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1208827090528661504/2TU2BD-6?format=jpg&name=144x144_2)
(https://t.co/pP6jbuTedb)Francis Asked Football Manager Not To Make Sign Of The Cross (Video)
Francis convinced the former football player and current manager of Italy’s national team Roberto Mancini, 57, not to make the Sign of the Cross on the football field, Mancini told Italian television...
gloria.tv
(https://t.co/pP6jbuTedb)
8h (https://twitter.com/gloriatv/status/1208835709089566720)
- (https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1208835709089566720) https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1208827090528661504/2TU2BD-6?format=jpg&name=144x144_2
- (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=85819&page=3#)
-
She is connected with the Association of Hebrew Catholics which is a huge red flag. This organization promotes various problematic ideas, such as celebration of Jєωιѕн holy days.
Thank you for that data point Jaynek.
I listened to Mother Miriam’s entire show and she is teaching the correct, pious form of the Novus ordo missae.
It seems she has a long way to go in her “pilgrimage of grace”.
-
It seems she has a long way to go in her “pilgrimage of grace”.
Yes, she does. But everyone has to start somewhere, unless he or she was lucky enough to be born into tradition. At least Mother Miriam sees that there is a big problem.
I recall once listening to EWTN/Catholic Answers radio, while driving in the car, which I usually can only listen to for a very short time, but a few years ago, I listened to an EWTN interview of Mother Miriam, and the interviewer was, I think, that idiot Patrick Coffin. The subject was about what marriage is, in a Catholic sense, and Mother Miriam was spot on, and she gave a really good account of Church teaching, to which Patrick Coffin was becoming increasingly uncomfortable, and he kept trying to change the subject, but she didn't let him. She didn't back down, and she just talked over him. I thought that was really good, even if she is just a Novus Ordo Catholic. At least she has some sense.
-
She is connected with the Association of Hebrew Catholics which is a huge red flag. This organization promotes various problematic ideas, such as celebration of Jєωιѕн holy days.
The Jews are trying to lead their opposition (trad Catholics awake to the Jew problem) with false converts like Mother Miriam. Any true convert's Jєωιѕнness will be dead in them, and only Christ alive in them.
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." ~ Jew Vladimir Ulyanov "Lenin"
(https://us14.proxysite.com/process.php?d=%2FK22vRSkIgSzII6i4177etdaqKv8WXUR8sytSQ%3D%3D&b=1)
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/3kblgg.jpg)