Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It’s the rise of the false right:Vigano, nobody nuns, Schneider, Burke, etc.All denouncing the conciliar subversion of the Church, but all committed to the same conciliar apparatus.Create the illusion of resistance, to trap those who might have resisted.
So you believe that everyone in the conciliar church who are expressing concern about Francis are doing so because they are intent on trapping anyone who might resist?
I believe those I named are doing so.They decry the consequences of the principles they never question.That requires a rather remarkable CRIME THINK ability.And I believe Francis (bad cop) approves of them (good cops).
You are entitled to your opinion, of course, but you named Vigano too.And yet Fr. Trincado, who is a Resistance priest, recently posted Ap. Vigano's latest writing on his website, "Non-Possumus." He has not disqualified Vigano, as you have. So I have to think that Fr. Trincado, at least, doesn't share your view.
There are likely to be red flags with Mother Miriam. It seems unlikely that she sees the entirety of the situation. But that doesn't mean that she is not sincere. That my point.Burke and Schneider have some serious flaws in their view of the problems in the Church - I don't pay much attention to them anymore, and Sean is probably right about the good cop/bad cop, at least when it comes to Burke/Schneider. But I don't think that they are all compromised. I'm sure there are problems with Vigano too. But...he sounds a lot like +ABL in his latest writing, posted on the Non-Possumus blog (at least on first perusal). Vigano's perception of the problem may at least be a little more clear than others. Though I have no idea what his views are on the Old Mass, and older devotions.
He says the new Mass, abides by the new CIC, dispenses only the new sacraments, is himself consecrated in the new Rite, and NEVER says Archbishop Lefebvre was right (or even defends him).Ps: Fr. Trincado is not the blogmaster of Non Possumus. He exercises only a consultative role on that blog, at the invitation of its owner.
Then why did the blog owner of non-possumus post Vigano's article in a favorable light? Is the owner of Non-Possumus a Novus Ordo Catholic? He must be, if he posted something that you don't like, right?Or maybe the owner of Non-Possumus is really an infiltrator who is really trying to keep everyone from resisting the errors of Rome. Could that be it?
(See updated post above)Are you trying to make enemies for me?I am quite sure the blogmaster was merely pointing out the accusations against Francis, not holding out Vigano as a champion of orthodoxy (as you seem to want to interpret the appearance of the article on that blog).On the other hand, my posts here are intended to prevent deluded souls from forming the conclusions you have formed.Consequently, there is no conflict really between NP and I, but between you and I😀.
I never said anything about Vigano being a champion of orthodoxy. But his article was posted in a favorable light on the Non-Possumus blog. And his article reminds me of +ABL. Vigano wrote a good assessment of the situation. You don't want anyone to acknowledge that. Fine. No one is allowed to say anything about the bad things that Francis is doing unless they have your approval that they are legitimate. Otherwise they have a bad intent. Got it.
I listened to Mother Miriam's radio talk and was impressed by her calm, intelligent delivery. She dissected Francis's "new humanism" as good as any trad.I would have to study her material more to see if there were any red flags. For example, if she supports Israel.