http://www.novusordowatch.org/resources.htmClick the above link and then scroll down a bit and you will see the following that you can click on:
Articles by Gregorius Quo Vadis, SSPX?: The Society of St. Pius X after the Lifting of the “Excommunications” of 1988 In January 2009, Modernist Rome issued a decree removing the censures against the SSPX from a decade before. The author looks at the ensuing doctrinal talks between the two sides and warns of what could be a very dangerous outcome.
Sede Vacante 1958-2008: Reflections on a 50-Year Vacancy of the Apostolic See Nineteen fifty-eight was one of the most disastrous years in the long history of the Catholic Church, for with the passing of Pope Pius XII was set in motion a sequence of events so devastating that the Church still hasn't recovered―and this report points to the seizing of the Holy See by her enemies as pivotal.
One and the Same Rite: How Benedict XVI Aims to Destroy the Traditional Latin Mass This study concerns Summorum Pontificuм, Benedict XVI's supposed liturgical Magna Carta liberating the Traditional Latin Mass, and shows how it is being used to draw unsuspecting Catholics into the Novus Ordo Church.
Refinishing the Great Facade: The Vatican, the SSPX, and the 'Restoration of Tradition' An in-depth exploration of why the "recognize and resist" position regarding Benedict XVI held by the Society of St. Pius X, The Remnant, and others represents a false solution to the crisis that will do exactly the opposite of what they intend: Seriously impede the restoration of Tradition, rather than hasten it.
No Friend of Fatima: Unspinning Christopher Ferrara's Defense of Benedict XVI Prior to April 19, 2005, lawyer/journalist Christopher Ferrara was one of the most scathing critics of Fr. Joseph Ratzinger, the head of Modernist Rome's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, yet on that fateful day, when Ratzinger became Benedict XVI, Ferrara has switched from prosecutor to defense attorney. Revealed here is how Ferrara plays spin doctor on a crucial subject: Benedict and the Third Secret of Fatima.
The Chair Is Still Empty: A Response to the Attack on Sedevacantism by John Salza, in 2 Parts
Also available in French (here) and Spanish (here)
Ex-Freemason John Salza has become a popular writer/speaker in conservative Novus Ordo and neo-traditionalist circles for his exposés of the Lodge in the Vatican II Church (a "priest" urged him to join the Masons!). But he is also the New Church's latest darling to attempt to refute sedevacantism. Part 1 of Gregorius' response addresses Salza's 2010 article "The Errors of Sedevacantism": Gregorius shows that Salza's critique is based on a flawed understanding of Sacred Theology and Canon Law and so does not pose a genuine challenge to the sedevacantist position. In Part 2, Gregorius deconstructs Salza's embarrassing 2011 article "Sedevacantism and the Sin of Presumption" and shows that Salza's incredibly poor scholarship is matched only by his complete incompetence on the matter he "presumes" to pontificate on. Exit John Salza... Two absolute slam dunks!
You Can't Have It "Your Way": A Response to Fr. Chazal's Arguments against Sedevacantism On Dec. 8, 2013, Fr. Francois Chazal (SSPX-SO) penned a letter to the Rev. Paul Kramer upon learning of the latter's rejection of Francis as the Pope of the Catholic Church and his embrace of "Resignationism", the idea that the Pope is still Benedict XVI. Chazal used the opportunity to make several arguments against the sedevacantist position. In this essay, Gregorius takes Fr. Chazal to task and demonstrates that his argumentation does not hold water and can in fact be used against his own "recognize-and-resist" stance. Absolutely devastating!