Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Not the SSPX of 40 Years Ago: Neo-SSPX Is Directly Attacking Sedevacantism ... P  (Read 9286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

How does this priest know “if you do not do this or that…?” So far as I’m concerned, if I’m not committing a sin, it’s none of the priest’s or anyone else’s business. If it IS a sin, he’s bound to secrecy. Holding to one or another position on the pope question is not a sin. It’s not a sin to think, “I don’t know!”
A wise person keeps his mind engaged, his eyes and ears open, and his mouth shut! 
It was not breaking the seal, no. One example- there was a big issue about Hounder's oils in the chapel. There were public and semi public online discussions through various social media outlets amongst the laity who attend(ed) the chapel, with the "blind-obedient-shut-up-stupid" on one side and others who did not want the invalid oils imposed on them nor their children for the confirmations and baptisms. So, the trouble makers (aka sedevacantists) were blackmailed to be quiet about it or else there will be no more access to sacraments in general for them. So naturally, they did no want any more part of that nonsense. 

One of the comments in the sermon video says:
“Let us pray that the SSPX and Vatican II can be announced as two aspects of the same Leonine theology”
It’s pretty clear where many SSPX faithful stand as well.


One of the comments in the sermon video says:
“Let us pray that the SSPX and Vatican II can be announced as two aspects of the same Leonine theology”
It’s pretty clear where many SSPX faithful stand as well.

Do you a time stamp for that at all?  That's a major one.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
“Let us pray that the SSPX and Vatican II can be announced as two aspects of the same Leonine theology”

Yikes!!! :laugh1:

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Do you a time stamp for that at all?  That's a major one.
It's only in the comments...