Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs  (Read 760 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stevusmagnus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3728
  • Reputation: +825/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs
« on: March 11, 2011, 09:21:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I've created this topic to allow all non-sedes to have a chance to discuss the recent comments of BXVI regarding the Jєωs without having to worry about discussing sedevacantism, whether BXVI is Pope, or being called Neo-Caths and other pejoratives for not accepting the sede thesis. I would ask the sedes here respect my wishes as the OP, and if they'd like to begin a sede-only topic on the same issue, be my guest, I will not post there. Thank you.
    Logged

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs
    « Reply #1 on: March 11, 2011, 01:34:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Hold yourself to your supposed standard, refraining from uninformed comments about sv-ism ,etc.  FWIW, you ELICIT many of the comments that you claim are unwelcome -- then you cry about them having been made.
    Logged
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3628/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs
    « Reply #2 on: March 11, 2011, 03:43:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Nice try but even SSPX can't defend him.
    Logged
    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13823
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs
    « Reply #3 on: March 12, 2011, 02:55:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Actually, the comments by our pope really should not surprise anyone who believes the popular mis-interpretation of EENS.

    Logged
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Non-Sedevacantist Discussion of BXVIs Statements on the Jєωs
    « Reply #4 on: March 13, 2011, 06:14:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Stevus, there's a site where you can do just that to your heart's content, it's called ANGEL QUEEN, pay them a visit... CathInfo is a more motley bunch, it's SSPX-leaning rather than SSPX-exclusive.
    Logged
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »