Be specific. Are you claiming that the CCEO 671 is a denial of the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and that the Byzantine Church defected from the Faith when this was published?

That distinction is really the only objection you can make. But it requires you to interpret their law and show how it is applied by them in a way that supports your conclusions. Otherwise, you can only say that the Byzantine Church has preserved the True Faith. You could say it hasn’t, but it wouldn’t make you a good Catholic.

Maybe if you do that, you should apply for a job at the Vatican (or Menzingen or wherever others like you go).

It's the same denial of EENS as V2.  The Byzantine Church has been modernized, same as the latin church (i.e. non Traditional).  That canon, as worded, is heretical.

That does not make the Byzantine Church heretical; it just means modern authorities codified a bad discipline and promoted bad theology in official texts.

  Now you sound just like latin-indulters, who defend new-rome from Trads.

Satan (and his minions) infiltrated the Church and started V2.  Do you really think they are THAT DUMB as to leave a huge chunk of eastern catholics with PURE Faith, and without pushing the same modernism on them?  Of course, they are going to push modernism everywhere.

The idea that there is some utopia of catholicism, in a mainstream way, in the world, is a fantasy.

Catholicism. is. under. attack. everywhere.  We are ALL underground.  Any "mainstream" church is infiltrated. 

I, for one, would very much appreciate ElwinRansom's take on the matter. He seems very knowledgeable about the Eastern Churches, or at least more so than any of us