Archbishop Viganò: Church of Council Realises Masonic Plan, Prepares Advent of Antichrist
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò doesn't believe that the Vatican published the third secret of Fatima completely in 2000.
Viganò told DiesIrae that those who saw the secret before its publication, said that it is about the Church’s apostasy which doesn't appear in the official version.
He blames the Cardinals Sodano and Bertone for this, and strangely passes over the fact that Cardinal Ratzinger participated in the publication and even wrote the secret’s official interpretation.
Viganò warns of attacks on the priesthood like the introduction of deaconesses, abolishing celibacy, and blurring the difference between the ministerial and the baptismal priesthood.
His guess: Francis will not officially allow female deacons but tolerate them quietly if German or Dutch dioceses go ahead. He stresses that Communion in the hand was introduced this way. After that, "Conservatives" could claim that “the Pope hasn't allowed anything new.”
For Viganò the Council’s Lumen Gentium committed a “doctrinal error” by turning priests into "presiders" of assemblies. He suggests treating the Council like the Pistoia Synod which contained errors and was therefore buried in oblivion.
Viganó observers that, after the Council, the Church of Christ was replaced by a “modernist and masonic” neo-Church that “sees itself as the spiritual arm of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, and as a defender of a Universal Religion”.
This corresponds for him to a masonic plan and prepares "the advent of the Antichrist.”

4Like Share

- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
yesterday
What is interesting to note is that in a recent talk by
Father Ripperger -- a renowned Exorcist -- he explained that prior to 1963, it was quite the norm that exorcisms would effect deliverance of the soul from diabolic possession in 2-3 days-- 7 days at most.
But that beginning in 1963 "overnight...like someone threw a switch", this was no longer the case, and that it began to take at least …More
- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
yesterday
" it was quite the norm that exorcisms would effect deliverance of the soul from diabolic possession in 2-3 days-- 7 days at most." Fr. Ripperger's claim is contradicted by the history of the
Loudun Possessions in 1634 and
the failed exorcism of Thomas Wu in 1949... and the
Thomas Hunkeler case in 1949 just to name a
few.
And a solid wall of "bold" isn't going to change history or the emba…More


2
- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
14 hours ago
OPERATIVE PHRASE: "...quite the
NORM..."
Citing exceptions can hardly disprove Father Ripperger's experienced and informed assertions as a highly experienced and knowledgeable Exorcist who has firsthand information we do not about the decidedly esoteric sphere of demonic activity and the number of the possessed and how their deliverances fared at various times in history.
"The exception prov…More
- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
yesterday
So Abp. Vigano's "proof" about Fatima consists of his own loudly stated opinion and hearsay. That's nice. Then he
really strikes out.
"Viganó observers that, after the Council, the Church of Christ was replaced by a “modernist and masonic” neo-Church that “sees itself as the spiritual arm of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, and as a defender of a Universal Religion”.Maybe that's true for
"The Church Of …More

- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
yesterday
Fatima is simple and the Vatican in true to form complicated it. Read the 1st and 2nd Secret. Did you easily understand both secrets? The true third secret will read exactly like the first two. It is imperative that Heaven delivered a secret that doesn’t require interpretation. The subject has something to do with Dogma. The vision is open to interpretation. Study here
biblicalcatholic.com/…oryO…More

- Report
- Edit comment
- Remove comment
yesterday
There is so much confusion in the Church it's hard to know anything for sure. I don't think we got the truth about Fatima, you can see it developing in the world.