URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,610700,00.html

Williamson Apology 'A Step in Right Direction'

Bishop Bernard Fellay, head of the Society of Saint Pius X, has told
SPIEGEL that his organization has "clearly distanced itself" from
Bishop Richard Williamson. Nevertheless, he says the bishop's apology
for his h0Ɩ0cαųst denial is a step in the right direction.

SPIEGEL: Bishop, weeks ago you gave your colleague Richard Williamson
a book so that he can read up on the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Last week he published
an apology which falls short of the Vatican's demand that he retract
his h0Ɩ0cαųst denial. Does Williamson's statement suffice in your opinion?

Fellay: It is definitely a first plea for forgiveness, and therefore
an important step in the right direction. One can always hope for
better phrasing. At least the plea for forgiveness is honest, and the
withdrawal of his words is genuine.

SPIEGEL: That hope seems unfounded. After his arrival in London,
Williamson surrounded himself with people who have openly denied the
h0Ɩ0cαųst, such as the historian David Irving. Do you know why?

Fellay: I have the impression that Bishop Williamson is being used by
these people. Information was deliberately fed to the media here.
We're working against that as well as we can. I am totally against
these connections.

SPIEGEL: But your influence on Williamson seems to be weak.

Fellay: We are in contact, he is in a priory of the Society in London
for the time being. But he is also a free human being. Sure, he has a
superior, but he is free in his decisions. But he has to bear the
consequences for that.

SPIEGEL: Will he return to his full duties?

Fellay: That is impossible under the current circuмstances. He has
damaged us and hurt our reputation. We have very clearly distanced
ourselves. He was not ordained as a bishop for his own personal
purpose but for the common good of the church, to spread the revealed
truth.

SPIEGEL: So why don't you exclude Williamson from the Society?

Fellay: That will happen if he denies the h0Ɩ0cαųst again. It is
probably better for everyone if he stays quiet and stays in a corner
somewhere. I want him to disappear from the public eye for a good while.

SPIEGEL: The Vatican could reinstate the excommunication because he
has not made a retraction.

Fellay: I doubt that. Denial of the h0Ɩ0cαųst, as serious as it is,
isn't part of canonical law -- so an excommunication isn't possible.
It isn't just we who say that, it is canons, legal experts. The
problem is that his comments have been linked to his office.

SPIEGEL: The Regensburg bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller has denied the
German Pius seminar in Zaitzkofen permission to ordain more priests.
Will you adhere to the ban?

Fellay: That was unnecessary and inappropriate. All these events
definitely are a setback for us. It throws us back by 10 years. But
ordinations will continue to happen.

SPIEGEL: In Germany politicians fear that schools run by the Society
don't share the values of the German constitution. Are you concerned
that there will be inspections?

Fellay: I'm not worried about that at all. We are normal people. We
observe the rules, and that includes the state order. Even if one
voice said something wrong. It is expressly written in the epistles of
the holy Paul that we honor authority and pray for it.

SPIEGEL: So Williamson is someone who has gone astray and criticism of
the Society is a big misunderstanding?

Fellay: Now we're the world's scapegoat, and every wrong step
immediately turns into a scandal. But mistakes that need to be
corrected are made all the time and everywhere.

SPIEGEL: Why did you respond so late to Williamson's crude theses?

Fellay: I confess that I didn't take the situation seriously enough.

It is increasingly disappointing to see the things Bp. Fellay has to say about this matter.

I've read several times that he referred to the Jєωs in the same manner as the pope has done... "elder brothers..." or some such thing. Can someone post when and where he said that as I've not seen the source of that quote?

Below is an interview with +F. He is clearly not changing
course with regard to +W. In fact, he is picking up speed.
ML
URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,610700,00.html
Williamson Apology 'A Step in Right Direction'
Bishop Bernard Fellay, head of the Society of Saint Pius X, has told
SPIEGEL that his organization has "clearly distanced itself" from
Bishop Richard Williamson. Nevertheless, he says the bishop's apology
for his h0Ɩ0cαųst denial [Still using the Enemy's false and slanderous epitaph] is a step
in the right direction.
SPIEGEL: Bishop, weeks ago you gave your colleague Richard Williamson
a book so that he can read up on the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Last week he published
an apology which falls short of the Vatican's demand that he retract
his h0Ɩ0cαųst denial. Does Williamson's statement suffice in your opinion?
Fellay: It is definitely a first plea for forgiveness [not!], and therefore
an important step in the right direction [and what direction might that be? grovelling of
racceptence form the raving тαℓмυdists?] . One can always hope for
better phrasing. At least the plea for forgiveness is honest, and the
withdrawal of his words is genuine [unless I;ve missed something, +W has withdrawn no
words, not a jot].
SPIEGEL: That hope seems unfounded. After his arrival in London,
Williamson surrounded himself with people who have openly denied the
h0Ɩ0cαųst [no! they openly doubt the story as canonized by the world via the
тαℓмυdists. Again, a blatant misrepresentation. typical and vile.], such as the historian
David Irving. Do you know why?
Fellay: I have the impression that Bishop Williamson is being used by
these people [say what? you mean you're making this up with nothing to back it up.
Alas, up to this point +F has not 'denied' one misrepresentation or calumny this NWO
reporter has blathered out. I am frankly shocked.]. Information was deliberately fed to
the media here. [Hello! your Excellency, what in the name of heaven duse that suggest
to you...hmmm.a conspiracy perhaps...by whom? hmmmm, oh no, not the Judaics, no
some unnamed fuzzy someone perhaps...]
We're working against that as well as we can. I am totally against
these connections.
SPIEGEL: But your influence on Williamson seems to be weak [what? to make him lie,
and grovel, renounce truth and reason?].
Fellay: We are in contact, he is in a priory of the Society in London
for the time being. But he is also a free human being. Sure, he has a
superior, but he is free in his decisions. But he has to bear the
consequences for that [yes your excellency, we all have to bear the consequences of
our actions and words. Something you might well dwell on].
SPIEGEL: Will he return to his full duties?
Fellay: That is impossible under the current circuмstances. He has
damaged us and hurt our reputation [no, no, say in is not so. The world thinks less of
the SSPX? Wake up and smell the coffee! They world despised you then and
despises you now. The Judaics will always hate you with a red hot glowing hate. If
you become their abject slaves they will then simply hate AND despise you.]. We have
very clearly distanced
ourselves. He was not ordained as a bishop for his own personal
purpose but for the common good of the church, to spread the revealed
truth [No and no and NO! The revealed truth is revealed to the world, which is in a
cesspool of error, lies, peversion, et al ad nauseum. So we should never comment on
or challenge the ways of the world? Bosh!].
SPIEGEL: So why don't you exclude Williamson from the Society?
Fellay: That will happen if he denies the h0Ɩ0cαųst again [How dense can you get? he DID
NOT DENY THE SO=CALLED h0Ɩ0cαųst! Where has reason gone? Where has
accuracy and truth gone? See appended transcript. There is no 'denial' there is a
questioning of the numbers and the method. Valid questions.] . It is
probably better for everyone if he stays quiet and stays in a corner
somewhere [bad dog! bad dog! offending poor NWO elides and Christ-hating
тαℓмυdists! Bad dog!]. I want him to disappear from the public eye for a good while
[dream on MacDuff! This will not be allowed to happen until he is dead, cowed, or
imprisioned].
SPIEGEL: The Vatican could reinstate the excommunication because he
has not made a retraction [what? this mouthpeice of Sauron is threatening the Bishop?
Is that part of his objective reporter's portfolio?].
Fellay: I doubt that. Denial of the h0Ɩ0cαųst, as serious as it is,
isn't part of canonical law -- so an excommunication isn't possible.
It isn't just we who say that, it is canons, legal experts. The
problem is that his comments have been linked to his office [Yes, this is true. +W should
have thought as a fox and a bishop, not as a college professor].
SPIEGEL: The Regensburg bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller has denied the
German Pius seminar in Zaitzkofen permission to ordain more priests [gosh, let's not
offend Bishop Mueller. The German Bishops have been so helpful to tradition and
SSPX in the past.]
Will you adhere to the ban?
Fellay: That was unnecessary and inappropriate. All these events
definitely are a setback for us. It throws us back by 10 years [this is just too much.
EVERYONE KNEW +W'S VIEWS LONG BEFORE THIS EVENT! The SSPX websites
and literature were/are full of ruth about the Jєωs, VII, etc. If you were thrown back
ten years Your Excellency, it was because you underestimated the enemy. What, you
thought they would just sit back and concede defeat? The name Chruch Militant is
NOT just a cool epitaph. Warfare with Satan is perilous and can be deadly] . But
ordinations will continue to happen.
SPIEGEL: In Germany politicians fear that schools run by the Society
don't share the values of the German constitution [excuse my French, but no shit
sherlock! The German constitution apparently values thought crimes, totalitarian
repression of individual rights, abortion on demand, and all the other evils of
revolutionary societies and socialist NWO devotees]. Are you concerned
that there will be inspections?
Fellay: I'm not worried about that at all [really? you ought to be. You ought to be
concerned with the nαzι=like tactics of the state]. We are normal people. We
observe the rules, and that includes the state order. Even if one
voice said something wrong. It is expressly written in the epistles of
the holy Paul that we honor authority and pray for it [sorry, this will not keep the
persecutions from happening.].
SPIEGEL: So Williamson is someone who has gone astray and criticism of
the Society is a big misunderstanding?
Fellay: Now we're the world's scapegoat, and every wrong step
immediately turns into a scandal. But mistakes that need to be
corrected are made all the time and everywhere.
SPIEGEL: Why did you respond so late to Williamson's crude theses ]oh, that's an
objective neutral question. Who is the crude one here, you NWO toadie?]?
Fellay: I confess that I didn't take the situation seriously enough [negative! your didn't take
the Enemy seriously enough!].
Interview conducted by Stefan Winter.

This makes me MAD!   :really-mad2: :really-mad2: :really-mad2: :really-mad2: :really-mad2:

SPIEGEL: The Regensburg bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller has denied the German Pius seminary in Zaitzkofen permission to ordain more priests.  Will you adhere to the ban?

FELLAY: That was unnecessary and inappropriate. All these events definitely are a setback for us. It throws us back by 10 years. But ordinations will continue to happen.

I love this one, too.  He is saying, "We have been blowing off the Pope and local Ordinaries for decades.  Do you think we will give a sh*t what they tell us to do now?  Lifted excommunications mean nothing in our (mental) practical order."

How is it "unnecessary and inappropriate" for the local authority to exercise his authority?  Is it not more a case of continuance of the habitual lip service on the part of the SSPX?