Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sede-privationism separation of body and soul  (Read 4591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bazz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Sede-privationism separation of body and soul
« Reply #30 on: January 07, 2011, 05:17:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Bazz
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Bazz
    Quote from: SJB
    It is an opinion based on what you've posted here at Cathinfo.

    Nice to see you can be "sure" with just an opinion and without a source.


    Saying "I'm sure" does not necessarily mean I'm expressing a certainty. But I'm sure you understand that, don't you Bazz?  :rolleyes:


    The definition of sure is certain.


    Bazz, when somebody casually says, "I'm sure" or "I'm certain", they don't usually mean that all error is excluded. They will usually downgrade to "opinion" if pressed.  :rolleyes:



    The more I see you write (yes, both "you" and "SJB"), the more I see how much of a liberal/modernistic influence you have been infected by.

    "All error is excluded"? As in "infallible"? So, you are never infallible and therefore never sure or certain? Perhaps on the hypothetical possibility of error everyone should doubt their own baptism and everyone else's because priests are not infallible! How about even though a pope is infallible, it never has an infallible effect on anyone because everyone's senses are not infallible in perception and comprehension! This is all stuff beloved by modernists.

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Sede-privationism separation of body and soul
    « Reply #31 on: January 07, 2011, 06:17:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Bazz
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Bazz
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Bazz
    Quote from: SJB
    It is an opinion based on what you've posted here at Cathinfo.

    Nice to see you can be "sure" with just an opinion and without a source.


    Saying "I'm sure" does not necessarily mean I'm expressing a certainty. But I'm sure you understand that, don't you Bazz?  :rolleyes:


    The definition of sure is certain.


    Bazz, when somebody casually says, "I'm sure" or "I'm certain", they don't usually mean that all error is excluded. They will usually downgrade to "opinion" if pressed.  :rolleyes:



    The more I see you write (yes, both "you" and "SJB"), the more I see how much of a liberal/modernistic influence you have been infected by.


    Would that be the same liberal and modernistic influence that allows you to avoid facing reality?  

    Quote
    "All error is excluded"? As in "infallible"?


    No, as in fear of error being excluded. True certainty.

    Quote from: Bazz
    So, you are never infallible and therefore never sure or certain? Perhaps on the hypothetical possibility of error everyone should doubt their own baptism and everyone else's because priests are not infallible! How about even though a pope is infallible, it never has an infallible effect on anyone because everyone's senses are not infallible in perception and comprehension! This is all stuff beloved by modernists.


    Degrees of certainty, possibly? Having moral certainty does not require having the charism of infallibility.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil