Author Topic: Neo-Cath Idiots Promotes Long Hair on Men (Read 3610 times)

stevusmagnus · « **on:** December 17, 2010, 10:35:26 AM »

(Mistyped. I meant to say "idiot". I can no longer change the title.)

I feel like I'm back at FE!

Quote

Personally, I look forward to the day when most men (other than the clergy, for the most part, who hopefully will mostly be tonsured) will once again wear long hair as well as stockings.

Our long pants are not only barbaric, they are an odious hold over from the French revolution. The stubby little jackets we get to wear with them remind one perpetually of Victorian mill towns. The best analogy for a tie is a noose.

It is obvious to any observer that the shorter hair became in the west, the less effective the west became overall. Just as once the British Army switched from red to khaki, it began to lose.

The Spanish kept their empire for all the centuries of long hair. In contrast, the buzz cut Germans' African "empire" didn't last three generations, and when it was toppled by a few local levies and an officer with a swagger stick, had only a few unprofitable farms to show for the effort.

Sampson not only had the jawbone of an ***, he had locks. To restore all things in Christ!

LM · « **Reply #1 on:** December 17, 2010, 10:46:39 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

(Mistyped. I meant to say "idiot". I can no longer change the title.)

I feel like I'm back at FE!

Quote
Personally, I look forward to the day when most men (other than the clergy, for the most part, who hopefully will mostly be tonsured) will once again wear long hair as well as stockings.

Our long pants are not only barbaric, they are an odious hold over from the French revolution. The stubby little jackets we get to wear with them remind one perpetually of Victorian mill towns. The best analogy for a tie is a noose.

It is obvious to any observer that the shorter hair became in the west, the less effective the west became overall. Just as once the British Army switched from red to khaki, it began to lose.

The Spanish kept their empire for all the centuries of long hair. In contrast, the buzz cut Germans' African "empire" didn't last three generations, and when it was toppled by a few local levies and an officer with a swagger stick, had only a few unprofitable farms to show for the effort.

Sampson not only had the jawbone of an ***, he had locks. To restore all things in Christ!

stevus, you won't accept that B16 (as his predecessor) is pushing the Church into an abyss, and this long hair/short pant mumbo jumbo is of concern to you.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #2 on:** December 17, 2010, 10:47:32 AM »

Forum-stacking..

This random bit of gossip - does it belong in the Crisis section?

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #3 on:** December 17, 2010, 10:48:36 AM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

Forum-stacking..

This random bit of gossip - does it belong in the Crisis section?

Gossip? Forum-stacking? What are you talking about?

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #4 on:** December 17, 2010, 10:49:38 AM »

Quote from: LM

stevus, you won't accept that B16 (as his predecessor) is pushing the Church into an abyss, and this long hair/short pant mumbo jumbo is of concern to you.

Of course I accept that B16 and his predecessors were and are pushing the Church into an abyss.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #5 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:01:24 AM »

Maybe you should make a thread to compile these things. The view is that this is not worth its own thread.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #6 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:04:02 AM »

To compile what? There are more where that quote came from.

If someone doesn't think this is worth a thread, they are free to not contribute to it. I don't think a lot of things are worth a thread, but it would be silly of me to go post on all of those threads that they are not worth it.

LM · « **Reply #7 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:05:29 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Quote from: LM
stevus, you won't accept that B16 (as his predecessor) is pushing the Church into an abyss, and this long hair/short pant mumbo jumbo is of concern to you.

Of course I accept that B16 and his predecessors were and are pushing the Church into an abyss.

Is pushing the Church into an abyss an extension of Peter's profession of faith in the Divine Nature of his Master.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #8 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:22:20 AM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: stevusmagnus
Quote from: LM
stevus, you won't accept that B16 (as his predecessor) is pushing the Church into an abyss, and this long hair/short pant mumbo jumbo is of concern to you.

Of course I accept that B16 and his predecessors were and are pushing the Church into an abyss.

Is pushing the Church into an abyss an extension of Peter's profession of faith in the Divine Nature of his Master.

No.

LM · « **Reply #9 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:27:27 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Quote from: LM
Quote from: stevusmagnus
Quote from: LM
stevus, you won't accept that B16 (as his predecessor) is pushing the Church into an abyss, and this long hair/short pant mumbo jumbo is of concern to you.

Of course I accept that B16 and his predecessors were and are pushing the Church into an abyss.

Is pushing the Church into an abyss an extension of Peter's profession of faith in the Divine Nature of his Master.

No.

Than what is B16 professing.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #10 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:28:47 AM »

B16 is professing a misguided liberalism that he thinks is Catholicism.

LM · « **Reply #11 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:35:32 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

B16 is professing a misguided liberalism that he thinks is Catholicism.

For B16 to be misguided, someone/some thing is guiding him.
Who/what is guiding him.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #12 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:36:01 AM »

Who knows?

LM · « **Reply #13 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:44:11 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Who knows?

There are two forces/two guidances in this world stevus . Since pushing the Church into an abyss is not in Peter's profession of faith in the Divine nature of the Master, who/what is guiding B16.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #14 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:46:42 AM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: stevusmagnus
Who knows?

There are two forces/two guidances in this world stevus . Since pushing the Church into an abyss is not in Peter's profession of faith in the Divine nature of the Master, who/what is guiding B16.

I've already said it is most likely diabolical disorientation. Then again it could be natural spiritual blindness. Who knows?