I had started a thread awhile back titled "An Olive Branch to Sedevacantists." I am still not a sedevacantist, but I express here my sympathies to sedevacantism. I know there had been controversy concerning St. Gertrude the Great in the past (not to bring up bad memories), but I have tended to go with the position of Fr. Cekada, Bp. Sanborn, and Bp. Dolan in some ways. Archbishop Lefebvre himself seemed to be on the way to the sedevacantist conclusion, but both sedevacantists and R&R sedeplenists still rightfully react in opposition to the Conciliar Church. I can see that the position of the sedevacantists is based on theology and canonicity, whereas that of R&R is based on practicality. Sedevacantists have the special advantage then of putting forth proper Catholic principles of ecclesiology, theology, and canonicity in the midst of all this crisis, while the SSPX-SO have the advantage of pointing out well (with most credit due to Bishop Williamson) the practical and philosophical problems of the modern age in both the Church and the world in all their various facets. Whichever position you take, you truly work for the Kingdom of God, and hence, you work "to restore all things in Christ."