.
Traditio has made its own reputation. Whoever it is that runs it ("Fr. Morrison?") has always refused the smallest correction. You're considered an ENEMY if you inform him of his typos, and even worse if you try to help correct his errors of fact. He's not interested in the truth, to put it bluntly.
He practices the same Modernism that he criticizes.
If you think the site has great info on it then you ought to copy it all because there will likely come a day when it's not there, anymore. This
is the Internet, you know.
He claims having had 21 million readers. That's a stupid lie, because you can most simply see that every time you enter the site, the counter goes up by one. If you, a single reader, visit the site 3 times a day for a year, he then claims to have a thousand readers because of your 'hits', but it's just you (one reader) going there 1,000 times. Some readers have visited many thousands of times, others just once or twice, and everything in between. So you could easily reduce his 21 million figure by 1,000 times, making it 21,000 readers. And many of them are very possibly non-Catholics, who are getting a pretty sour impression of what Catholicism is all about: misspelling, bad grammar, historical inaccuracy, ill manners, calumny, detraction, hate-speech, presumption of authority and pugnacious pompous pride. Are they going to be attracted to the Faith by that? I hardly think so.
Who has ever converted to the Catholic Church by reading Traditio? You can be SURE that if it had happened, "The Fathers" would have been parading it around like a medal of honor. But 'they' have not a whimper to evoke. Nor do 'they' provide the Sacraments as priests are supposed to do. How could "they" have time to hear confessions or visit the sick when 'they're' answering thousands of msgs every day? Answer: 'they' couldn't.
If he were honest, he'd say 21 million VIEWS, but he NEVER says that, nor does he acknowledge the point. He
ignores it. He keeps saying "readers." So he has an inflated ego, and no regard for objective truth when it's inconvenient for his agenda. IOW, he is a Modernist.
Priest or no priest; he's dishonest. If someone points out a clear historical error (or, any other error, for that matter), then he should fix it. Not the first time, by the way, that I have emailed Traditio, asking for corrections to articles which they have made, and of course, they have refused to make them.
Jehanne, you've been wasting your effort trying to impress him. He won't be corrected and he wants nothing to do with precision or truth. He is addicted to posting articles, replete with typos, errors of fact and bad grammar, all the while
pretending to be doing you some kind of favor. You have to LET HIM GO.
.