Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
2 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.
Fake st Francis 1 vs fake st Francis 2.You guys are insane. AI is not real. It cannot re-create a person’s ideas.
Let them play, it keeps them occupied lol
Now ask me if I think those Masses that name the manifest heretics in the Canon are pleasing to God or a profanation (regardless of the intention of the minister or laity present) I do believe yes, those are profanations (though I realize they are not intended to be so).
Let's play a realistic game:
Ask it if the popes since Vatican 2 are heretics. Answer: No, the popes since Vatican II are not heretics. Catholic doctrine holds that heresy requires the obstinate denial, after reception, of a truth that must be believed with divine and Catholic faith.
I already showed you that AI says they are heretics. Remember when I posted about Mortalium Animos?
I already showed that AI says that they are not heretics. I mean, it could not be any clearer.
So, you don't remember?
No, I just asked it a clear question and got a clear answer. No need to take it any further.
Nor do you know how to use AI. It's not a sage. It's a tool. You need to feed it facts to work on. Don't expect to ask one question and have it tap into all the docuмents in the whole world just for your instant pleasure.
Then all anyone needs to do to get the answer they want, is not ask clear questions, instead, phrase the question accordingly = AI is a joke.
So, it's a joke when I ask AI to pull up a quote from St. Thomas Aquinas about baptism of desire, and it does?What the joke is is that you don't accept it!
I accept that far as sedeism goes, AI can give you whatever answer you want it to give you, depending on how you phrase the question. This makes it useless for sedes to use it to prove sedeism, which, for most trads, sedeism in and of itself is useless anyway.