Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross  (Read 14535 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2025, 11:31:38 AM »
So you'll notice that the shape formed by the arms of the figure they try to pass off as Our Lord clearly represent a witch's stang.

Compare this to the actual literal stang that Jorge was caught carrying around.




So, there are several paradigms for interpreting the Crisis.

One involves a deliberate infiltration of Satanists into the Church with the conscious intention to destroy, blaspheme, and to defile.

These AntiPopes make the case for that more compelling with each day that passes.
Thanks for making the connection between the PVI crozier and the stang, and posting the photo of it. 

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2025, 12:00:34 PM »
https://akacatholic.com/leo-xiv-international-man-of-mystery/

From Leo Verrecchio:
"For what it may be worth, however, I took a look at archived versions of the website for the Diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, dated 2015 to 2023, the time during which Prevost served as its bishop, to see if it might provide some clues as to his mindset. 
I found very little in that regard save for the image to the right, which appeared on the diocesan homepage for most of that period. 
When you look at that image, what is the first thought that comes to your mind?
Now, it may be that the rainbow, in this case, signifies something entirely innocent, but let’s not be naïve. Peru, like practically every other nation on earth, has an active LGBT community. Chiclayo even has its very own “Pride” parade every June. No educated person can possibly fail to recognize that the rainbow is widely understood as a symbol for this godless movement. "
It’s so familiar to the average person that it’s often used as a marketing tool that tells would-be patrons, “We support the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖist cause!”





Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2025, 11:43:40 PM »



Now… when successive  minions of the anti-Christ are more openly revealed on the Seat, do we start to understand Our Lady of LaSalette’s tears and warnings .

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #28 on: June 05, 2025, 12:21:49 PM »

The satanic crozier is back
Leo Watch | Ep. 1 "The Church does not want to wave the flag of possessing the truth."


Roman Catholic Media

From the transcript of the video:
Bishop Sanborn:

12:09
Actions speak louder than words and a picture is worth a thousand words at his (Leo XVI) very first Sunday mass he uses the ferala of Paul VI
For those who don't know your excellency that cross that would be so associated- the drooping cross with JP2- now some might say well art is just a matter of taste- why is this such a bad thing why do you think it's a...

No it's not matter of taste- it art especially religious art telegraphs a very strong message about something sacred and that was actually Paul VI that got that thing out or he had it made Paul VI had notoriously bad taste everything he liked was
extremely ugly and so he carried around this ugly cross and it is Christ in His defeat which was never portrayed in any Catholic art since the first century
 
Christ was victorious on the cross that's where He defeated sin and and the effects of sin He and the resurrection is only a manifestation of His victory but the victory was on the cross and that's why the Catholic you know the cross is always decorated and you know it's  something that is everywhere and yes it shows His sufferings but His sufferings were His victory He was not defeated on the cross speaking more to that posture yes that posture and He said "No one takes my life from me." See so He could have stayed there forever if He wanted to because He was the author of life I give up my life when I want to and that's when that's why He cried out with a loud voice at the end to show that He was giving up His life of His own accord and that's why the centurion said this man is truly the Son of God because He cried out with a loud voice it's in the gospel see nobody does that everyone gasps at the end and they you know just pass away especially with loss of blood and you know you become delirious the physical impossibility of you could not cry out with a loud voice so that's His victory

And so to carry around a cross like that- what's the message they're trying to send your excellency?
I really don't know I mean it's not a good message though I mean it's to deny the victory of the cross implicitly I would say and it is to denigrate the cross in other words it's it's a sort of an identification with man's misery that's what I think it is but it's just something that is repulsive but for him to carry that around says I identify all with everything back to Paul VI straight continuity that's the uniform if he wanted to make a break he would use the traditional triple cross...

The pope never carried anything until Paul VI...
So does the pope not carry anything in procession?
No he doesn't carry a crozier he doesn't carry anything...you know that he's the pope he does special things you see- and no- that was invented by Paul VI
15:32

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #29 on: June 05, 2025, 03:23:58 PM »
So that "crozier" also shows Our Lord's arms in the shape of a witch's stang.  It's not merely grotesque.



Actual Stang ...