Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Author Topic: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross  (Read 14548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Incredulous

More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« on: May 15, 2025, 06:57:44 AM »


Church Revolution in Pictures
Pope Francis Cross 01
The strange pectoral cross of the Bishop of Rome
Above left, you see the pectoral cross of Card. Jorge Bergoglio when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires; at right, his cross after he was elected Pope or Bishop of Rome, as he insists on being called. Several things are strange about these crosses that invite speculation:
1. It is not uncommon for religious authorities to leave off the image of Our Lord Crucified on their pectoral crosses. However, even when they do so, implicitly it is  clear that their crosses symbolize the Crucified Christ, the Redeemer who by His death canceled the guilt of Original Sin and re-opened the road of salvation. Further, the fact that those prelates wear their crosses on their chests, close to their hearts, means that they are proud disciples of the Crucified, ready to shed their blood for Him.
The cross of Pope Bergoglio makes a point of denying this truth. On his cross he pictures the figure of the Good Shepherd, as if he were saying, "I do not believe in Original Sin and, therefore, there was no redemption from it." This would correspond to the progressisivt theory that pretends Original Sin was a myth invented by the Church to explain a primitive stage of mankind in the universal evolution.
2. The shape of the cross is not that of a traditional cross. The crossing of the two beams is not defined, but spread out. It does not look like a symbol of the torment He suffered, but a simple metal plaque with a sculpture. Again, it sends the message that Pope Francis is not comfortable with being a representative of Our Lord Crucified.
3.  On the plaque a dove representing the Holy Spirit is also shown descending from heaven over the flock and the Good Shepherd. One does not find any mention in Scripture of a scene where the Holy Spirit comes down directly over the flock. More likely it is an allusion to the Protestant-Pentecostal theory that claims God does not need the Catholic Hierarchy, but gives His orientation to the flock by a direct action of the Holy Spirit. 
No need to say that it also implicitly denies the role of the Pope, who according to Catholic Faith, is the Vicar of Christ on earth, who is the one called to govern and teach the flock.
4. The metal of the cross is a cheap one. The different colors of the two crosses suggest that Bergoglio has more than one cross with the same symbols in different metals. His cross as a cardinal, at left, looks like a blend of brass; the second one he wears as Pope, at right, looks like either a blend of iron or pewter. 
In both cases, what is clear is his rejection of the gold and precious stones that normally are used for pectoral crosses. It is a symbolic affirmation that the Church must not be rich. This is part of the miserablist thesis affirming that, after the Church left the Catacombs, she wrongly imitated the world as she bestowed on her dignitaries precious symbols of their missions. By using this cross Pope Francis symbolically affirms that he wants to wipe out this conception and return to the poverty of the times of the Catacombs, before the Church took on these "sins."
This is not a novel or original position. Throughout the History of the Church heretics of diverse origins defended precisely the same thesis. They include the Manicheans in the third century, Mazdah in Persia and the followers of Paulicanism in Armenia in the sixth; Bishop Claudius of Turin and Bishop Agobard of Lyons in the ninth.
Multiple Gnostic sects burgeoned in the Middle Ages, such as the Friends of God in Byzantium, the Dragovitsna church in Bulgaria, both predecessors of the Cathar movement. One of the Cathar branches was called the Poor Men of Lyons, founded by Peter Waldo, which generated the Waldensians and the Albigensians. 
The Cathar current defending a Miserablist Church also included movements like the Communiati, the penitential order of the Umiliati, the Patarini, the Apostolic Brethren and the Fraticelli, who enjoyed the support of Michael of Cesana and William of Occam. Many sects that preceded the Pseudo-Reformation are also included in this current, such as the followers of Wycliffe in England, Jan Hus in Bohemia, Savonarola and Campanella in Italy, and Luther and Thomas Munzer in Germany. 
These are some of the heretics who defended the same thing that Progressivism upholds regarding the riches of the Church. Now, Pope Francis brings these ideas to center stage, after the way was prepared by the other conciliar Popes. Thus,  a completely different face for the Church is starting to be shaped.
5. The fact that Pope Francis did not choose a new cross, but kept the one he had as Archbishop, seems to reveal that he does not consider the dignity of a Pope to be essentially higher than that of a Bishop. This also is confirmed by his insistence on being called Bishop of Rome, instead of Pope.
Pope Francis Cross 2

Logged

Offline Persto

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2025, 12:58:41 PM »
Logged

Offline Persto

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2025, 12:59:44 PM »
Logged

Offline Persto

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2025, 01:02:55 PM »
https://www.barnhardt.biz/
Let us hope and pray that L14 never dons this wretched Antichristic pectoral cross of the satanist Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago ever again.  But if he does… 👀 we’ll report it here. Because that horrific pectoral cross is a dog whistle. All of Antipope Bergoglio’s lapdog fαɢɢօts wore it, and it hangs over Bergoglio’s wretched tomb in Saint Mary Major. Make absolutely no mistake.
Logged

Offline Persto

Re: More on anti-Christ pectoral cross
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2025, 01:03:19 PM »
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/02/20/swine-hellfire-and-sodo-imagery-the-bernardin-bergoglio-pectoral-cross-is-an-icon-of-the-antichrist-read-on-for-disposal-instructions/

Swine, Hellfire and Sodo-imagery. The Bernardin-Bergoglio pectoral cross is an icon of the Antichrist. Read on for disposal instructions.

Okay.  Because I’m now morally certain, I’m going to go ahead and call the Bernardin-Bergoglio pectoral cross as an icon of the Antichrist.  There’s just too much evidence.
Mark Docherty has made a post at his place that is a compendium of everything about the Antichrist icon so far, with all of the pictures.  It is a great resource to help spread the word on this.
Now that thousands and thousands of eyes are on this thing, several more horrifying motifs have been identified.
First, the animal on the far left is a swine.  Look at the thickness of the body and especially the hindquarters.  No sheep looks like that. That’s a ham if ever I saw one.  As Mark Docherty said, “I smell bacon.”  I smell bacon too.  Definitely.  Swine NEVER have any positive connotation in Scripture or iconography. In fact, because Our Lord cast the demons into the herd of swine, who then promptly committed ѕυιcιdє by running en masse off a cliff, swine have a very, very consistent tie to the demonic and to hell and damnation.
That’s a pig, folks.
Next, the “grass”.  A lot of people think it looks more like flames.  Especially since it goes ABOVE the animals.  I agree. It subsumes the animals completely.  They aren’t standing upon it.
Finally, the tunic.  A BUNCH of people emailed in about the tunic.  Not only is there a phallus shape front and center, but the folds on the viewer’s right look suspiciously like a hand grasping the phallus.
Now here is what is going to happen, so you’re prepared.  Any discussion of this will be the target of GASLIGHTING.  “Mentally ill conspiracy theorists,” “filthy-minded sex perverts,” blah, blah, blah.  You know yourself.  Are you a filthy-minded sex pervert?  Probably not.  So don’t be bothered by the GASLIGHTING.  Are the things we have described either clearly visible (like the backwards-facing leg and the swine on the left) or sufficiently plausible as to factor into the calculus?  Of course they are.  DON’T FALL FOR GASLIGHTING.
Additionally, let’s think tactically from the enemy’s perspective for a moment.  If you were Bernardin, an actual Satanist and infiltrator to the highest levels of the Catholic Church, wouldn’t you get your kicks from wearing something, like this pectoral cross image, that contained satanic iconography, but at the same time was subtle enough for you to wear openly, mocking God and the faithful as you walked around, laughing interiorly at the “stupid rubes” who couldn’t see what you were LITERALLY dangling in front of them?  Of course.  THAT’S THE ENTIRE POINT.
The backstory on Antipope Bergoglio’s connection to this wretched thing as having originated with him doesn’t check out.  Bernardin was CLEARLY wearing this thing (the swine is just visible) before he ordained Wilton Gregory a bishop in ARSH 1983.  We know this from THIS picture of Gregory emcee-ing Bernardin’s Mass.  Bishops don’t emcee outside of Papal Masses.

The “artist”, whose signature is beneath the feet of the figure, was a sculptor from Genoa, Italy named Antonio Vedele.  Vedele is the man who sculpted the image as a mold, which was then cast into metal.  Apparently, Vedele, who died in ARSH 1997, passed the original mold to a student of his during the 1970s named Giuseppe Albrizzi who then cast more of them.  Bergoglio started wearing his copy while Archbishop of Buenos Aires in the 1990s.  But it is important to note that the Vedele Antichrist pectoral cross did NOT originate with Bergoglio in Buenos Aires, but was also worn for decades previously by the KNOWN SATANIST PEDOPHILE SODOMITE Cardinal Joseph Bernardin.  I doubt Antipope Bergoglio’s cross is Bernardin’s, as Bernardin was probably buried with his in ARSH 1996. But they are absolutely the cast from the same Vedele mold. They are identical.
I can find nothing about Antonio Vedele except his dates (ARSH 1930-1997) and the fact that he was a sculptor, working mostly in silver, in Genoa.
 

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
« previous next »