Yep, and Roncalli was the first such Communist infiltrator in the papacy. You get all this, how the Church has been infiltrated, but refuse to accept the possibility that they made it into the papacy?
Well, the Church has certainly been infiltrated, but can the Papacy be infiltrated? Theologians say God can not permit a false Pope to have Universal Acceptance. Thus, at least some Bishops would have refused to recognize Pope John XXIII if he was a false Pope.
Fr. Hunter: "If the Bishops agree in recognizing a certain man as Pope, they are certainly right, for otherwise the Body of the Bishops would have been separated from their Head, and the Divine Constitution of the Church would be ruined.
I certainly agree the 60s were a chaotic time anyway, and as +ABL said, "World War III" took place at Vatican II between the traditional Fathers and the liberals. Vatican II makes any omissions and has glaring ambiguities that were used by the libs after the Council ended to get what they ended. But I believe the traditional Fathers successfully intervened to save the final texts from outright heresy. Likewise, I believe there is no heresy, although there are many deficiencies, in the final text of the New Mass. I agree the Council can be viewed as a type of chastisement for our sins.
I agree with the Fatima Centre, and with that article you posted, that the full text of the Third Secret has not been revealed, and so on, but the Fatima centre has never been sedevacantist. Apostasy going to the top can mean among Cardinals, or can also mean the Popes, by errors and omissions, like St. Peter denying Christ out of weakness only, can in some way contribute to the apostasy themselves. I also agree with the Pope Pius XII quote in the Fatima article. It makes sense Our Lady warned not to tamper with the Liturgy, and how this could become suicidal to the Church's Mission.
Nevertheless, the bottom line is, Our Lord did not say to His Church. "I will be with you until 1958/62/65/69" only. He promised to be with Her until the end of time. As Fr. Gleize said recently, echoing Fr. Hunter it would seem, "That the Church can be habitually deprived of Her Head is an absurdity and contrary to the promises of indefectibility", i.e. of Christ's promise to be in Her in His Spirit for all time.
The question for sedevacantists regarding Fatima is, "If most Latin-Rite Bishops aren't even Bishops now, as most sedes hold, and if there is no Pope either right now, as all sedes hold, can the Consecration of Russia even be done, and the Period of Peace finally come?"
God Bless.