I'm not surprised to see Voris prattle through some rather obscure positives that he claims Francis has supported, albeit without any references or footnotes so how can we check him ― and likewise mounts a mini-assault on those who would dare claim this Gwuerl-in move is something to be lauded.
But it's conspicuous as usual, that the focus is on one big glaring PROBLEM move while all the other problem moves are entirely ignored.
He scrapes the barrel bottom to dredge up the APPEARANCE of orthodoxy, while he only touches on ONE of the much more numerous items of glaring Liberalism.
It is simply a very BIASED report and editorial, in a word, POLLYANNA.
Call him
Michael Pollyanna Voris from now on, because that's his M.O. of choice.
.