Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV  (Read 911 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline josefamenendez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5443
  • Reputation: +4100/-281
  • Gender: Female
Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
« Reply #15 on: May 09, 2025, 05:16:43 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Is this the same Michael Hoffman who wrote "Judaism Discovered"? That's a good book.
    Yes, it's him.
    I think his best book was "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare".

    Modify message title=Modify message





    Offline Oldyank

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +45/-9
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #16 on: May 09, 2025, 06:29:49 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think my most hated sayings is "DIALOUGE"  " BUILDING BRIDGES".  IS RIGHT UP THERE.  And let's not forget, "everyone is welcome" 


    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +2443/-424
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #17 on: May 09, 2025, 06:40:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I just caught the end of a total "I love and support Leo XIV" gushing session from Tay Tay Marshall.  :facepalm:
    That sounds really gαy from tay tay.::)

    Online VerdenFell

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 292
    • Reputation: +262/-35
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #18 on: May 09, 2025, 07:24:43 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think my most hated sayings is "DIALOUGE"  " BUILDING BRIDGES".  IS RIGHT UP THERE.  And let's not forget, "everyone is welcome"
    They have a fetish like attachment to those words, almost like autistic kid fixated on Thomas the Train. 
    They are so out of touch with reality that after 50 years of dialogue and building bridges all of these other sects...
    protestants, evangelicals, muslims, jews, secular humanists, etc.
    still hate Catholics WITH A PASSION.
    Maybe their leaders will have themselves a nice all expenses paid trip to one of these unity conferences the Vatican sponsors but the consensus of the average non Catholic is that we are pagan, Mary worshipping, bead counting, Bible
    distorting, and completely corrupt.
    Say anything in the comment section of any story pertaining to Christianity that is positive about Catholicism and these people will dogpile on with the insults and condemnations 

    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 981
    • Reputation: +741/-143
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #19 on: May 09, 2025, 07:31:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • That sounds really gαy from tay tay.::)
    Here is the thing about the Tay Tay Marshall grift --

    He was a married Anglican priest with a well-paying benefice. Surprising to some Catholics, not all Anglican priests are married. Celibacy was once required amongst the Anglican clergy to be an Oxbridge don.

    Most Anglican clergy who swim the Tiber are subsequently ordained as Catholic priests for the Ordinariate (doubtfully valid Novus Ordo Orders unfortunately). However, Tay Tay opted to remain a layman yet immerse himself in churchy and theological matters. He did this commercially with his books, JewTube channel, and the grossly overpriced and unacredited New St. Thomas Institute.

    As a Catholic priest he would have had a modest income and his family would have had to live in institutional parish housing. But as a wowee-zowee Catholic media influencer affiliated with Trad, Inc. since about 2015, he brings in a six-figure income, jets to Europe at will, lives a bourgie lifestyle in an affluent  neighbourhood, and dresses like a WASPish prep. None of that would have been possible had he presented himself for Catholic [sic] ordination as most former Anglican clergy do.

    Living the grift.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46291
    • Reputation: +27250/-5037
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #20 on: May 09, 2025, 08:39:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is the thing about the Tay Tay Marshall grift --

    He was a married Anglican priest with a well-paying benefice. Surprising to some Catholics, not all Anglican priests are married. Celibacy was once required amongst the Anglican clergy to be an Oxbridge don.

    Most Anglican clergy who swim the Tiber are subsequently ordained as Catholic priests for the Ordinariate (doubtfully valid Novus Ordo Orders unfortunately). However, Tay Tay opted to remain a layman yet immerse himself in churchy and theological matters. He did this commercially with his books, JewTube channel, and the grossly overpriced and unacredited New St. Thomas Institute.

    As a Catholic priest he would have had a modest income and his family would have had to live in institutional parish housing. But as a wowee-zowee Catholic media influencer affiliated with Trad, Inc. since about 2015, he brings in a six-figure income, jets to Europe at will, lives a bourgie lifestyle in an affluent  neighbourhood, and dresses like a WASPish prep. None of that would have been possible had he presented himself for Catholic [sic] ordination as most former Anglican clergy do.

    Living the grift.

    Very interesting analysis.  Don't some NO "priests" who don't take vows of poverty get fairly wealthy?  Couldn't he have become a married priest AND done his JewTube stuff?  Or would his duties as a priest gotten in the way?

    But, yes, if I were an Anglican priest and converted, I'd most certainly want to continue functioning as a priest ... rather than take the payoff.

    Offline WhiteWorkinClassScapegoat

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 921
    • Reputation: +603/-506
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 05:21:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It would be great if a 5th Column traditionalist assumed the Seat and he chose the name Pope Chrysostom, and proceeded to wage war against the jews, muslims, fαɢɢօts, freemasons, atheists, communists and feminists, along with outlawing the novus ordo missae and abjuring all of Vatican II Council, and reaffirmed the Tridentine Mass as the primary Liturgy in the Roman Rite. 
    Dan shall be a serpent in the way, a viper by the path, that bites the horse's heels so his rider falls backward. ~ Genesis 49:17

    My avatar is a painting titled Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ (1913) by Adolf Hitler

    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 981
    • Reputation: +741/-143
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 12:20:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Don't some NO "priests" who don't take vows of poverty get fairly wealthy?  Couldn't he have become a married priest AND done his JewTube stuff?  Or would his duties as a priest gotten in the way?

    Some Novus Ordo diocesan priests do accuмulate wealth, but this happens rarely from their salaries and stole fees alone. This usually results from good investing -- real estate, financial market -- and inherited family wealth. They are able to invest since things like housing & utilities are paid for apart from their own incomes. And these are single men, meaning no dependents.

    As for Taylor Marshall, had he gone the route of Catholic priesthood, whether in a regular Novus Ordo diocese or in the Ordinariate, he would have been answerable to his bishop and all that means. We might regard Marshall's message as a watered-down neo-traddyism, but he what he says is alarming to your average Novus Ordo Catholic and offensive to Novus Ordo bishops and priests. He could simply never have become "Taylor Marshall, LLC" as we know and experience him. At best -- provided he would find time to do so apart from pastoral responsibilities -- he would have been another bland Catholic Answers or EWTN guy in a collar had he gone the priesthood route while also being a media personality.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18254
    • Reputation: +5647/-1948
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 02:40:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nope.  We shouldn’t support a false leader. 
    May God bless you and keep you

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46291
    • Reputation: +27250/-5037
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Michael Hoffman's take on Leo XIV
    « Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 03:10:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some Novus Ordo diocesan priests do accuмulate wealth, but this happens rarely from their salaries and stole fees alone. This usually results from good investing -- real estate, financial market -- and inherited family wealth. They are able to invest since things like housing & utilities are paid for apart from their own incomes. And these are single men, meaning no dependents.

    As for Taylor Marshall, had he gone the route of Catholic priesthood, whether in a regular Novus Ordo diocese or in the Ordinariate, he would have been answerable to his bishop and all that means. We might regard Marshall's message as a watered-down neo-traddyism, but he what he says is alarming to your average Novus Ordo Catholic and offensive to Novus Ordo bishops and priests. He could simply never have become "Taylor Marshall, LLC" as we know and experience him. At best -- provided he would find time to do so apart from pastoral responsibilities -- he would have been another bland Catholic Answers or EWTN guy in a collar had he gone the priesthood route while also being a media personality.

    Great points as usual.  You're absolutely right that his NO "bishop" would have shut down any criticism of the "hierarchs", and that's precisely the vacuum his show fills and the type of audience he appeals to and capitalizes on.  Those gap-fillers are the ones that become wealthy ... such as Rush Limbaugh when he pioneered appealing to disgruntled conservative who had no voice, follwed by Fox News, and then others.

    It all makes sense now why Marshall Inc. went the route he did, choosing mammon over the priesthood.