What Jorge is doing with moral theology is the same thing that his predecessors had already done with dogmatic theology.

Jorge focuses on the "good things" WITHIN a sodomite relationship.  So, for instance, there might be some mutual affection, kindness, sacrifice, etc.  Jorge believes that these positive aspects can be blessed in isolation from the evil aspects.

Similarly, with false religions, V2 emphasized that there is some truth and goodness in these religions, e.g. they might believe in one God, some that Jesus is God, etc.

This is the foundation of all these errors.

But, as we know beginning with St. Augustine, evil is nothing more than a privation of good, and pure evil does not exist, meaning that EVERYTHING that exists has some good in it ... even Satan and the demons.  This ontological presence of some good within something does not mean that the thing is good as a whole.

What's appalling in the video are the clips of the Antipopesplainers claimg that Jorge is being perfectly orthodox, including the one guy that had previously condemned the blessings of couples.  It's diabolical.

Wait is their statements diabolical or is it out of context? Sorry at work atm will have to watch later.

It's absurd to think that a sodomitical "couple" is going to ask for a blessing for any reason other than a validation of their depravity.

Just watched it, it was excellent

Wait is their statements diabolical or is it out of context? Sorry at work atm will have to watch later.

Video points out the one pope-splainer (I like how the Dimonds use the term "Antipope-splainer" instead) who before Fiducia Fornicans stated that it would be evil and non-Catholic to bless a "couple" (vs. an individual) and than after FF declaring the opposite, that it's perfectly Catholic to bless the couple.  That shows great dishonesty and mendacity.

Another Catholic celebrity going for his doctorate.

Good point. What's with all the Hollywood celebrities becoming NewChurchers?