Im really struggling with these issues and I do not know who to turn to because I get conflicting answers. Correct me if Im wrong in these assertions.
For example CMRI believes in BOD and NFP and they say I can go to SSPX.
SSPV says yes to BOD, NFP, and una cuм masses, but no to CMRI.
Bp. Sanborn says yes to BOD, NFP, CMRI, but no to SSPX masses.
MHFM says no to BOD, NFP, but yes to SSPX and even EC in communion with Rome.
Talk about confusion lol. Reminds me of when I had to cram for a chemistry test.
These "confusions" are relatively small when compared to the confusions we find in the Conciliar church. In sedevacantist circles, the confusion is in very fine points of doctrine on a few specific issues. In non-sedevacantist circles, the confusion is in
every single aspect of spiritual and liturgical life as well as in
every aspect of the administration of their church.
Perhaps it is true that sedevacantists disagree in their understanding of BOD and NFP. But it is without doubt that non-sedevacantists believe that there are no truly binding doctrines for modern
ecuмenism is clearly the foundational dogma of that religion. Even then, some of them reject this (the SSPX) and others pretend it doesn't exist (FSSP and others) while their leader(Bendict XVI) and others go all out to bring both heretics, schismatics, pagans, Jєωs, and even athiests together to pray to Satan for peace to the accolades of the world community and Conciliar catholics alike because, for them, it doesn't matter one iota what one believes or does as long as we all get along.
And we complain about confusion over small points of doctrine among actual Catholics?