Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede  (Read 4091 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2009, 06:24:19 PM »
The devil tells lies with many truths as he did in 1973 when no valid pope could approve it.  Tell some truth and kind of add in, "pray for the pope" and all the fools will be duped as this blog proves.  

If an apparition contradicts doctrine it ain't from Mary.  

Where in Trent, Denzinger or any official teaching does it say a heretic can be Pope?

More does not say this either.  You are grasping at straws.  

If you prefer false apparitions approved by heretics over Catholic Doctrine I can only hope you change before you die.


Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2009, 06:25:29 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth
The devil tells lies with many truths as he did in 1973 when no valid pope could approve it.  Tell some truth and kind of add in, "pray for the pope" and all the fools will be duped as this blog proves.  

If an apparition contradicts doctrine it ain't from Mary.  

Where in Trent, Denzinger or any official teaching does it say a heretic can be Pope?

More does not say this either.  You are grasping at straws.  

If you prefer false apparitions approved by heretics over Catholic Doctrine I can only hope you change before you die.

Mary does not say this either.  I'm pretty sure Saint Thomas More didn't either but I meant to say Mary rather than More.


Offline CM

Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2009, 06:30:00 PM »
I agree with LoT's last statement, which is why I hold that Lourdes and La Salette are legit.  Not Fatima.

Offline CM

Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2009, 06:31:25 PM »
Quote from: Catholic Martyr
I agree with LoT's last statement, which is why I hold that Lourdes and La Salette are legit.  Not Fatima.


Whoops, I meant this one:

Quote from: LoT
If you prefer false apparitions approved by heretics over Catholic Doctrine I can only hope you change before you die.

Marian Apparitions seem to deny Sede
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2009, 06:34:23 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth
Akita is not approved by the Church .


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Akita


During a Sunday Mass in 1982, the story goes that Sister Agnes was totally cured from her deafness. Bishop John Shojiro Ito of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Niigata who had been an eyewitness to some of the events at Akita initially approved the apparition in 1984. In 1988 he went to Rome to consult with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (who later became Pope Benedict XVI). As the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Ratzinger formally approved Our Lady of Akita as supernatural and worthy of belief.