Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: PG on December 21, 2017, 09:34:19 PM
-
I am really getting tired of this 3rd secret stuff. Now the sspx thinks there is a hidden explanation by the (fake) sister lucia(hidden deep in the vatican). Isn't it problematic that they believe in the fake sister lucy, but they think that the 3rd secret bishop in white wasn't jp2? Didn't fake sister lucy say the 3rd secret was about jp2? Anyways, here is a new sspx video talking about this hidden explanation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8HrtVUB83c
-
Good observation PG.
Isn't it interesting how CFN and the Remnant dominate the trad news?
They have at least as much influence on Catholics as a local bishop does.
Now, the Remnant, CFN and the SSPX, after ignoring the compelling evidence on the 2nd fake Sr. Lucy, try to sell us a new conspiracy theory? It sounds like this theory gives the SSPX cover to do "prelature" with newChurch.
Obviously, the SSPX and their envoys have paid for influence in these newspapers.
There is still discussion that the SSPX actually controls CFN now.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L1XjgVIebfM/maxresdefault.jpg)
Chris Ferrara, the Jersey City lawyer and Michael Matt, the new "Alex Jones" from the catacombs...
Lead our beleaguered trad movement further away from the truth everyday.
-
God forbid the sspx join new Rome in order to infiltrate "deep into the vatican" to unearth the suppressed and hidden third secret explanation(of the fake sister lucy). Isn't there a scripture passage that says basically " a wicked generation seeks a sign"?
Fr. Jenkins was talking about the fake sister lucy theory on wcb ohio I think a few months ago. And, he said there was an interesting correspondence between fake sister lucy and JP2. She wanted to visit JP2 on a visit to rome, and JP2 declined to meet with her under the pretext of more important matters. Fr. Jenkins thought that was really telling, being that she is a pretty important person, and wanting to meet, but was avoided. JP2 probably knew she was fake. But, modernists minds are mush, and he wouldn't know the first thing to do about it.
Regardless, I error on the side of bishop Sanborn, who responded to a ladies phone call about fatima asking "what to make of it all in our day" blah blah. And, he replied basically, "not much". "Don't make much at all of it".
To me fatima simply means try to convert the russian orthodox. And, that is a loaded statement. They don't call russia "mother" for nothin.