See, those of us who realize that the Vatican II religion cannot be reconciled with Catholicism but that Vatican II Latrocinium Delendum Est (it must be scrubbed), this is a waste of time. He's clearly a Conciliar guy and even felt that Bergoglio's interpretation of V2 is "masterful", rather than stepping back even to Ratzinger's hermeneutic.
This has always been the battle in Traditional Catholicism between those who feel that the Crisis can be solved by a few course-corrections to the Right, after it had veered too far to the Left ... which is +Fellay's new position, vs. those who believe that V2 and the Conciliar Church represent a substantial rupture and must be completely eliminated. Schneider started the debate with +Vigano by claiming that we could just "fix" a few things here to get everything back on track, and +Vigano objected in one of the most articulate explanations for how V2 was/is substantially corrupt and unsalvageable.
Resistance, SVs ... believe that there's a substantial break.
neo-SSPX, Schneider, FSSP, etc. ... hold that things can be fixed by some course-corrections.
That's really what the debate is about.
For those of us who hold to the substantial break position ... how conservative or liberal Prevost is matters nothing, since until he's ready to repudiate Vatican II, the New Mass, the new saints, the new Canon Law, religious indifferentism, etc. ... it means nothing.
Topic: Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic (Read 2362 times)