You are a dishonested, retarded baboon. First of all, these are not facts, but teachings and disciplines. If you actually understood the notion of universal acceptance, you'd understand that theologians derived it from the infallibility of the Ecclesia Credens, based on the logical Major that the Church cannot universally embrace an erroneous rule of faith. And yet, according to you, the Church CAN universally embrace grave doctrinal error and a harmful Mass. Johnson, you are nothing short of a heretic who denies the indefectibility of the Church. You are a manifest heretic, and are not a Catholic.
Sweetie:
I just love it when you make stuff up, and attribute it to others.
You would do better to shut up, and learn something.
1) Ladislaus says the opposite of every pre-conciliar theologian: A universally accepted pope is not a dogmatic fact.
2) please quote where I say the Church can embrace grave doctrinal error (and please be careful to define “embrace”).
3) please quote where I say the church can “embrace” a harmful rite of Mass, and be sure to explain the relevance of that allegation to the present issue.
Ps: Sweetiepie, please explain why your denial of the universal consent of approved preconciliar theologians anyone should listen to your continual hot air?
Topic: ++Lefebvre and sedevacantism (Read 36840 times)