Author Topic: Krah chose Williamsons lawyer (Read 22648 times)

Wessex · « **Reply #60 on:** December 29, 2010, 02:43:51 PM »

Why little comment on Krahgate? Angelqueen has banned the topic, while Ignis Ardens is full of it.

MauricePinay · « **Reply #61 on:** December 30, 2010, 10:08:04 AM »

Could it be that the Fellayite bureaucracy has a stronger hold in the U.S. than the U.K.?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #62 on:** December 30, 2010, 11:47:59 AM »

Krah defenders aren't very active on this board, hence, there's no real controversy here.

Ethelred · « **Reply #63 on:** December 31, 2010, 10:44:49 AM »

I think there's several answers to "Why little comment on Krahgate?" here :

- the British people are more liberal (than the USA), I think
- the British Ignis Ardens forum definitely is more liberal than Cathinfo, so there are more "pro Krah" and "pro anti-christian Jєω" guys over there.
- The Bishop is British. :-) On the other hand, he likes the American catholics and spent most of his priestly time in America (US and South America), so probably he's better known amongst the US traditional catholics than in Europe?

Another interesting question is:
Why zero comment on Krahgate in the German zone Internet?
(One possible answer: Because it's a highly liberal zone and the Fellay/Schmidberger/Pfluger zone...)

To all devout catholics I wish a blessed New Year 2011.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #64 on:** December 31, 2010, 02:06:24 PM »

I put it down to the advanced command of English they have over at IA.

The good writers over there seem to have it all nailed down!

And a blessed 2011 to you, Ethelred.

Wessex · « **Reply #65 on:** January 05, 2011, 03:00:23 PM »

Not sure about that. They are going through all kinds of emotions: shock, disbelief, denial, understanding .... plus the usual threats to ban people. We trads have to navigate a minefield of illusion and suspicion.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #66 on:** January 05, 2011, 03:12:02 PM »

Quote from: Wessex

Not sure about that. They are going through all kinds of emotions: shock, disbelief, denial, understanding .... plus the usual threats to ban people. We trads have to navigate a minefield of illusion and suspicion.

Well, it's important to be realistic. They way Bishop Fellay has been behaving is going to neutralize the SSPX. It's not going to restore the Church. It's going to end up in the collapse of the Faith inside the SSPX itself. That's what's at stake here. Calling someone a slanderer or detractor isn't changing the reality of Bishop Fellays' behavior, or its very grave implications.

There's only so much phoniness that people can tolerate before they know, instinctively, inside, what's going on.

Ethelred · « **Reply #67 on:** January 05, 2011, 03:12:17 PM »

I think Wessex is right. Also, thank you Elizabeth.

A kind person finally translated William of Norwich' opening of the Krahgate into German. Deo gratias! Vergelt's Gott.

There's a copy posted on IA forum, as well as on the German summarize of the Krahgate:

krahgate.blogspot.com

Emerentiana · « **Reply #68 on:** January 05, 2011, 07:17:57 PM »

I have heard that Bishop Williamson is going to let SSPX pay the fine he owes the court and not defend himself. Has anyone else heard this?

hollingsworth · « **Reply #69 on:** January 07, 2011, 01:20:30 PM »

Telesphorus:

Quote

Well, it's important to be realistic. They way Bishop Fellay has been behaving is going to neutralize the SSPX. It's not going to restore the Church. It's going to end up in the collapse of the Faith inside the SSPX itself. That's what's at stake here.

I'm waiting for a restoration of the 'Society militant.' Right now we have the 'Society semi-benign,' the 'Society willing-to-talk.' Presently speaking, I view the Society's war against modernist Rome as little more effective than trying to fell a huge Oak with a pen knife. To put to flight and eventually destroy the huge post-V2 monster, one needs more than a reluctant attack chihuahua. I agree, +F's 'behavior,' if you will, is not going to restore the Church. But then, maybe we should be looking for something other than Church restoration. The consecration of Russia and the revelation of the 3rd Secret would not hurt.

roscoe · « **Reply #70 on:** January 07, 2011, 01:50:22 PM »

In case no one has heard, the consecration of Russia implored at Fatima actually refers to the whole world-- so says Pius XII(XIII).

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #71 on:** January 07, 2011, 02:26:06 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

In case no one has heard, the consecration of Russia implored at Fatima actually refers to the whole world-- so says Pius XII(XIII).

So what you are saying is that the Consecration has already taken place? If that's what you are saying, then I will counter by saying that is false. The three days of darkness have not come yet, so the Consecration hasn't yet taken place.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #72 on:** January 07, 2011, 03:58:24 PM »

It was surprising to read on Ignis Ardens that none of the German SSPX schools had been closed as the result of crack-downs following +W's interview.

What was most surprising was the SSPX schools get financial assistance from the German Government! (according to Pilgrimage of Grace).

Also, there had been problems with one of the school's treatment of students some 15 years ago. IMO, that could be what has people walking on eggshells.

(I hope I am remembering this correctly.)

roscoe · « **Reply #73 on:** January 07, 2011, 04:35:55 PM »

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

Quote from: roscoe
In case no one has heard, the consecration of Russia implored at Fatima actually refers to the whole world-- so says Pius XII(XIII).

So what you are saying is that the Consecration has already taken place? If that's what you are saying, then I will counter by saying that is false. The three days of darkness have not come yet, so the Consecration hasn't yet taken place.

SS is attributing to moi words that I have not said-- this is not the first time.

John Grace · « **Reply #74 on:** April 13, 2011, 01:18:54 PM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

Tele, to me it seems that Norwitch is saying, "None of these people, Krah included, are hiding the fact that they are Jєωιѕн".

Maximilian Krah never denied being Jєωιѕн.He declared himself to be an 'unimpeachable Catholic'