Author Topic: Krah chose Williamsons lawyer (Read 35776 times)

Elizabeth · « **Reply #35 on:** November 30, 2010, 11:53:02 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

But I continue to attend their chapels because I know that each priest is a different man, which means that some can be holy while others have serious issues. AND getting the Sacraments in an atmosphere where the entire Catholic Faith is preserved is very important. Likewise, now that I have a family, it's important that the sermons be sound and the Catholic Faith be taught inviolate.

Yes! Each priest is a different man! That goes for each Roman Catholic priest of whatever group he belongs to.

Also, (speaking of SSPX) a lot of the newer ones are just radiant in their love for souls.

Belloc · « **Reply #36 on:** November 30, 2010, 11:54:45 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

I'm clueless because I haven't "connected the dots" that Christ's promise was a lie and the Church defected, there is no Pope, problem solved?

No thanks. I fear "connecting the dots" = making rash and presumptuous assumptions based on scant or non-existant evidence.

some dots are not dots at all, some are dots because we want them to be..........that is why some are so led astray....

Emerentiana · « **Reply #37 on:** November 30, 2010, 12:02:51 PM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

I'm clueless because I haven't "connected the dots" that Christ's promise was a lie and the Church defected, there is no Pope, problem solved?

No thanks. I fear "connecting the dots" = making rash and presumptuous assumptions based on scant or non-existant evidence.

Maybe you should study the history of the church! Youll find that the church has had many many antipopes, and survived. We just have a new series now. This is the longest period of Interregnum in the church's history.
The book Tumultuous Times by Fr Dominic and Fr Francisco Radecki spells it out. You can get it on Amazon.com
BTW......spoken like a lawyer! Cant see the forest from the trees.
Im a simple lady......you dont have to be a scholar to know whats happening today. In fact, most scholars have been derailed!

BTW, most lawyers are very busy and dont spend all day on forums. Whats your motive for all of this? Being paid, maybe? :scratchchin:

Telesphorus · « **Reply #38 on:** November 30, 2010, 12:07:07 PM »

The Pope authorizes people in the Vatican to say condoms are acceptable in certain circuмstances.

The Pope kisses a Koran.

The Pope invites representatives of other religions to worship at Assissi and an idol of Buddha is put on the altar there.

Now, how far down the path to corruption and heresy must a Pope go before we say the gates of hell have prevailed in his particular case?

Can we never say it, no matter what he does? There is no conceivable case where we would have to say he cannot be Pope?

And does it really follow that the Church defected if there was an invalid election in 1958?

Belloc · « **Reply #39 on:** November 30, 2010, 12:14:55 PM »

one has to prove the election in 1958 was wrong, though a lot of speculation.......

as I notd in hte past, and will note now as clear as ican be, I could give a rats ass who is or is not a Pope......we have a crisis, one we would contend with whether a Pope is dead and were would be in-between reigns, one if Siri was elected or not,etc.....we are in crisis mode and debating who is or is not a Pope is detracting from the crisis worldwide on a whole....believe B16 is Pope or not, in the end of the day, do the flowers bloom, the birds sing and the sun shine? No, we have the dark of winter night regardless of B16 is a Pius the 10th, a Luther,etc.....

again, could really care......it is not important.imagine, if oyu will, Pius 10 dies and we did not get a new pope for 10 yrs-would that mean the crisises were abatted? no problmes?.....so Pope, no Pope, intergum of 52 yrs, does not amtter a hoot, at end of day, will be in crisis mode regardless......

lets finally move on.....