Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Krah chose Williamsons lawyer  (Read 35767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Krah chose Williamsons lawyer
« Reply #30 on: November 30, 2010, 09:51:28 AM »
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
I saw that article. No surprise that AQ deleted it either. They love locking and deleting threads over there.


All interesting or pertinent and intelligent debate is immediately locked with a sarcastic quip.

It's like their mods have radar as to whenever substantive discussion is occurring and they feel compelled to stamp it out.

Krah chose Williamsons lawyer
« Reply #31 on: November 30, 2010, 10:05:19 AM »
Quote from: Emerentiana
At the end of all of this there will be a spilt in the Society.
One group will go with the Vatican !! church and the other group will become sedevacantists.
 


note sure where you got this conclusion from, other than wanting itto be true-in 70's, not like ABL went SV...if there is a split, if, then why do we not think those not going to Rome, per se, would not remain as they are now, but also, no SV????

again, wonder if for some SV is almost a religion in itself....


Krah chose Williamsons lawyer
« Reply #32 on: November 30, 2010, 11:02:17 AM »
Quote from: stevusmagnus
I don't think there is any reason to panic. BF doesn't want Tradition linked to revisionism, nαzι groups, etc. It would mean the enemy wins. He's simply being prudent and cautious. BW is complying.

I think everyone is blowing this out of proportion. There is no reason for BF to sell out his life's work for nothing. Have some Faith. The enemy wants us to turn on each other. Divide and conquer.


Like I told you before, Stevus.........you just cant connect the dots in this battle between the forces of Christ and Antichrist!    Clueless! :pop:

Krah chose Williamsons lawyer
« Reply #33 on: November 30, 2010, 11:11:31 AM »
I'm clueless because I haven't "connected the dots" that Christ's promise was a lie and the Church defected, there is no Pope, problem solved?

No thanks. I fear "connecting the dots" = making rash and presumptuous assumptions based on scant or non-existant evidence.

Krah chose Williamsons lawyer
« Reply #34 on: November 30, 2010, 11:13:26 AM »
Quote from: stevusmagnus
A lot of Sedes have been constantly squawking about a "sell-out" and using the Williamson affair as a chance to divide the Society, instill hopelessness in Society members and get them to become schismatics along with them. It seems they take every chance they get through whatever means necessary to ruin any possible doctrinal discussions with Rome. In my opinion Sedevacantism is poison and a false solution to the Crisis. Sedevacantism is the mirror image of Neo-Catholicism in that both mindsets delusionally ignore the crisis. The Neo-Caths say, what crisis? The Church is fine. The Sedes say, what crisis? There is no Pope. Only crisis is in a false church anyway. Neither mindset either recognizes the true nature of the crisis or encourages jack squat to actually be done about it. Neo-Caths passively await orders and what insanity they will defend next. Sedes passively sit there in their caves waiting for God to re-establish His Church miraculously while they take pot shots at the Society and other Trads who are actually trying to do something to resolve the crisis.

As I've said before, what possible basis do Society Catholics and Sedes have to discuss any crisis in the Church? The Sede response will be one or two lines saying "see I told you he's not Pope" or "there goes the anti-Church again", etc. There is nothing to discuss if you are a Sede except how miserable this anti-pope and false church is. If you are a Society Catholic there are very many substantive issues and distinctions to be discussed in what is happening in the true Church that REALLY is visible and does exist during this crisis.

I see a lot less activity on the forum lately and I'm afraid it is due to the large influx of Sedes who either kill or derail any intelligent non-Sede discussion of the crisis. This is why I  requested any Sede discussion limited to its own forum. Sedevacantist premises completely eviscerate the dialogue between non-Sedes. How can I have an intelligent discussion on anything the Pope did with someone who is working off the premise he is an evil usurper layman? We're not even on the same planet.


Maybe there is a lot less activity Stevus, because you have come in here and taken over the threads with your rediculous posts.  Get the BIG Pictutre.   Its a battle for souls out there, and ALL Catholics whetever persuasion are game  in this Battle! :fryingpan: