Maurice Pinay makes a good point, we haven't seen any confirmation that "Maximilian Krah" is Jєωιѕн.  However, it is very disquieting that someone who participates in fundraising for Tel Aviv university and for Jєωs making Aliya would be in charge of SSPX finances and choosing legal counsel for a society bishop.  Simply unbelievable.

The Krah at the Jєωιѕн fundraiser is the same one as the Krah in the CDU periodical.  Now do we have absolutely proof that this same Maximilian Krah is the one who is managing the good faith contributions of SSPX faithful?

To put the monies of SSPX faithful into such hands, knowingly, would deserve a long prison term, if there were justice in this world.

Now that the questions are out there, I think BF or an official Society response should at least address it.

He'd better address it, or he and the Society are going to see our tithes dropping off dramatically.  If +F is going to play this matter close to the vest, as is his wont, then maybe our money, or the great reduction of it into Society and chapel coffers, may force his hand.  Let the money speak.

I don't think there is any reason to panic. BF doesn't want Tradition linked to revisionism, nαzι groups, etc. It would mean the enemy wins. He's simply being prudent and cautious. BW is complying.

I think everyone is blowing this out of proportion. There is no reason for BF to sell out his life's work for nothing. Have some Faith. The enemy wants us to turn on each other. Divide and conquer.

No, there has been a change in the Society. Maybe not just over a couple of events but in a general direction. I would say the few shows of conservatism in Rome and those stillborn doctrinal talks have turned the heads of the leadership as it has for some other groups. At the same time a spring cleaning operation has been going on to make the Society more acceptable to a less hardline conservative audience, to make it easier for some accommodation to be made with Rome and to avoid potention friction with secular authorities. In this respect it is logicial for the leadership to want to see the back of those it welcomed in the old days, including Bp. Williamson. ABL has long gone and Menzingen wants a new corporate image and will employ modern methods to achieve its new goal. The Society is not a democracy and one man can decide its fate without too much difficulty.

A lot of Sedes have been constantly squawking about a "sell-out" and using the Williamson affair as a chance to divide the Society, instill hopelessness in Society members and get them to become schismatics along with them. It seems they take every chance they get through whatever means necessary to ruin any possible doctrinal discussions with Rome. In my opinion Sedevacantism is poison and a false solution to the Crisis. Sedevacantism is the mirror image of Neo-Catholicism in that both mindsets delusionally ignore the crisis. The Neo-Caths say, what crisis? The Church is fine. The Sedes say, what crisis? There is no Pope. Only crisis is in a false church anyway. Neither mindset either recognizes the true nature of the crisis or encourages jack squat to actually be done about it. Neo-Caths passively await orders and what insanity they will defend next. Sedes passively sit there in their caves waiting for God to re-establish His Church miraculously while they take pot shots at the Society and other Trads who are actually trying to do something to resolve the crisis.

As I've said before, what possible basis do Society Catholics and Sedes have to discuss any crisis in the Church? The Sede response will be one or two lines saying "see I told you he's not Pope" or "there goes the anti-Church again", etc. There is nothing to discuss if you are a Sede except how miserable this anti-pope and false church is. If you are a Society Catholic there are very many substantive issues and distinctions to be discussed in what is happening in the true Church that REALLY is visible and does exist during this crisis.

I see a lot less activity on the forum lately and I'm afraid it is due to the large influx of Sedes who either kill or derail any intelligent non-Sede discussion of the crisis. This is why I  requested any Sede discussion limited to its own forum. Sedevacantist premises completely eviscerate the dialogue between non-Sedes. How can I have an intelligent discussion on anything the Pope did with someone who is working off the premise he is an evil usurper layman? We're not even on the same planet.

To be honest, I am not at all concerned with what goes on in apostate Rome and the Society is becoming a lost cause. Internal conflict seems to be the order of the day all round and the clutching of straws on many a blog is getting very depressing. I think I am going to see more spirituality in fly-fishing or rose-growing. I will pass on golf.

I saw that article. No surprise that AQ deleted it either. They love locking and deleting threads over there.