Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Just met a second fssp priest.  (Read 4827 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Just met a second fssp priest.
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2017, 08:57:33 AM »
Quote from: Nadir
The point is that some priests of the FSSP serve in non-FSSP parishes, and so have to fullfil the requirements of the newchurch parishes and newchurch bishops, even if they are on the conservative side. They also acknowledge the Novus Ordo as valid, in fact calling it the "ordinary" rite, as opposed to the "extraordinary" rite. And that these are one and the same Mass. Therefore their "Ordinary Rite" is a preferred option for which they are trained. That does not mean that they do not learn to say the Novus Ordo. If you read the link I posted and opened the links at the bottom of that page you might understand the compromised situation they are in.  


Both Bishop Williamson and Fr. Pfeiffer have said that it is ok to go to the Novus Ordo.

Just met a second fssp priest.
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2017, 02:33:16 PM »
Quote from: poche

Both Bishop Williamson and Fr. Pfeiffer have said that it is ok to go to the Novus Ordo.


The opinions of +W & Fr P are questionable. I do not accept the Novus Ordo and do not attend it.

Anyway why are you changing the subject?

This thread is about the FSSP and their alleged compromising/faithfulness to tradition.


Just met a second fssp priest.
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2017, 03:53:27 PM »
Quote from: magdalena59
Quote from: Jovita
The first one convinced me that fssp was created to capture traditionalists. This second guy at a growing community must have the folks duped or they are just sooo desperate that they oversee the obvious flaw in this priest. He is NOT a traditionalist. I am willing to give it one more try, just to say, three strikes your out.


Sorry to hear that.

I am wondering what it is that convinced you that he was not a traditionalist?

--------------------------------------------------
http://ourdomesticcalling.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------


This:

Quote from: Ekim
the problem with the Fraternity was not the validity of the Mass, it was the sin of omission.  By their refusal to point out modernism and modernists in Rome they place Souls in grave danger.  +Fellay use to say that they make the true Mass just another side show in the Ecuмanism Circus.

Just met a second fssp priest.
« Reply #23 on: February 27, 2017, 04:00:35 PM »
Quote from: poche
Quote from: Nadir
The point is that some priests of the FSSP serve in non-FSSP parishes, and so have to fullfil the requirements of the newchurch parishes and newchurch bishops, even if they are on the conservative side. They also acknowledge the Novus Ordo as valid, in fact calling it the "ordinary" rite, as opposed to the "extraordinary" rite. And that these are one and the same Mass. Therefore their "Ordinary Rite" is a preferred option for which they are trained. That does not mean that they do not learn to say the Novus Ordo. If you read the link I posted and opened the links at the bottom of that page you might understand the compromised situation they are in.  


Both Bishop Williamson and Fr. Pfeiffer have said that it is ok to go to the Novus Ordo.


It is NOT okay. I was told this by a Roman Catholic (Latin Mass only) priest who escaped the fssp.

Just met a second fssp priest.
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2017, 12:43:46 AM »
Quote from: Nadir
Quote from: poche

Both Bishop Williamson and Fr. Pfeiffer have said that it is ok to go to the Novus Ordo.


The opinions of +W & Fr P are questionable. I do not accept the Novus Ordo and do not attend it.

Anyway why are you changing the subject?

This thread is about the FSSP and their alleged compromising/faithfulness to tradition.


I am not changing the subject. those two leaders of eh resistance did say that it was ok to go to the Novus Ordo What I said was in response to what Nadir said when she said;

 The point is that some priests of the FSSP serve in non-FSSP parishes, and so have to fullfil the requirements of the newchurch parishes and newchurch bishops, even if they are on the conservative side. They also acknowledge the Novus Ordo as valid, in fact calling it the "ordinary" rite, as opposed to the "extraordinary" rite. And that these are one and the same Mass. Therefore their "Ordinary Rite" is a preferred option for which they are trained. That does not mean that they do not learn to say the Novus Ordo. If you read the link I posted and opened the links at the bottom of that page you might understand the compromised situation they are in.