Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Jurisdiction, Plants and Divided Clergy and Laity  (Read 6954 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jurisdiction, Plants and Divided Clergy and Laity
« Reply #35 on: June 27, 2012, 09:42:17 AM »
Nobody but SJB has ventured a response to "ubipetrus'" position on the jurisdiction of the traditional hierarchy.  People use the jurisdiction issue to undermine SV though in reality, if it undermined anythingm it would undermine the entire traditional movement and validates new Church with invalid sacraments.  

But the jurisdiction issue does not undermine or invalidate the visibility of the Church, the confusion over jurisdiction is merely a reflection of the time of apoastacy we are in which is a result of the shepherd being struck and the sheep being scattered.  


Jurisdiction, Plants and Divided Clergy and Laity
« Reply #36 on: June 27, 2012, 10:30:44 AM »
Quote from: Elizabeth
Quote from: Elizabeth
Quote from: Lover of Truth




One of the facts on this blog is that people make icons out of their favorite clergy and have this they can do no wrong attitude much as parents who say “Not my Johnny”.  Oh yeah?  Elizabeth, for instance, is okay with people talking bad about the SSPV but if someone, who knows more than her about the situation the she should dare to mention the Cekeda/Dolan duo in a negative way she acts like some expert on the issue denouncing it all even though she does not have the facts.  That is just one example though there are many more that are much worse.    

.


Hi LOT.  From whom did you get your idea that I do not have the facts, that I have no right to be an expert?

I'd love to know, because whoever it is who told you is a flat-out liar, not a "stand-up guy" or gal.  

And who have I made an icon out of?

 



You may have missed this, LOT.


Hi LOT. :cheers: