Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: “Juridical Validity” of Pope Benedict’s Attempted Partial Resignation  (Read 4858 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nottambula

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Reputation: +60/-53
  • Gender: Female
The Vatican has known all along that Benedict’s renunciation was invalid as written, and here’s the proof!
 
 
by The Editor

The Falsified Letter of Pope Benedict was not a novelty, the Vatican had already falsified all the translations of Benedict’s Act of Renunciation.

https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/04/08/the-vatican-has-known-all-along-that-benedicts-renunciation-was-invalid-as-written-and-heres-the-proof/



Veri Catholici‏ 
@VeriCatholici


If the Vatican actually thought a resignation of ministerium effected a  resignation in conformity with canon 332 §2, then they would NOT HAVE  FALSIFIED the vernacular translations of the Act of Renunciation to hide the word MUNUS and replace it with MINISTRY! - This is a fact!
https://twitter.com/VeriCatholici/status/1115259994763669504



Veri Catholici‏ 

@VeriCatholici


There is no UNIVERSAL nor PEACEFUL acceptance of Pope Benedict's Resignation when the VERY FIRST act of the Cardinals is to falsify the translation of the text of resignation to hide the fact that its not in conformity to canon 332 §2!
https://twitter.com/VeriCatholici/status/1115298158395973632
"I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson

Offline nottambula

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Reputation: +60/-53
  • Gender: Female
https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/06/09/pope-benedict-has-tacitly-accepted-that-his-resignation-was-canonically-invalid/


Pope Benedict has tacitly accepted that his resignation was canonically invalid

by The Editor



By Br. Alexis Bugnolo

On January 30, 2019, Pope Benedict received at the Vatican, through the hands of Archbishop Georg Gänswein, the canonical brief I sent him demonstrating conclusively that the act contained in the declaration, Non Solum Propter, of Feb. 11, 2013 was not in conformity with the term of Canon 332 §2, which requires the renunciation of munus for a valid Papal resignation, and that therefore he remains the sole valid Roman Pontiff.

In my letter to the Archbishop, I indicated how the Holy Father could contact me in response to the brief. One Hundred and Sixty Days have passed without any objection to the arguments presented.

According to the norms of the Vatican itself, if no objection is made to a canonical assertion after 90 days, tacit consent is indicated.
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Here is the proof of delivery, via FedEx: Shipping Slip

Here is the text which I sent: in PDF*
____________________
* The PDF contains the same canonical arguments, only slight differences in its introduction. Also, in April of this year, I sent to the Holy Father, by regular mail, the same brief, but containing the Ad Obj. 16-19, which I added after January of 2019.[/font][/size]
"I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson


Offline nottambula

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Reputation: +60/-53
  • Gender: Female
https://twitter.com/VeriCatholici/status/1139996604302278656

Veri Catholici‏ 
@VeriCatholici


Now that Benedict has tacitly indicated that he regards his resignation as possibly invalid, those journalists, bishops, cardinals and clergy who continue to regard Bergoglio as indubitably the Pope are living in a FANTASY world.
1:42 PM - 15 Jun 2019


Veri Catholici‏ 
@VeriCatholici

 Jun 15

Because, according to the norm of Canon Law, he who first possesses the papacy is the pope, therefore, if there is any doubt that Benedict's resignation was valid, there can be no lawful adhesion to Bergoglio's claim to the papacy UNTIL THE DOUBT IS RESOLVED!


Veri Catholici‏ 

@VeriCatholici

 Jun 15

And there is NOW REAL AND AUTHORITATIVE Doubt to the validity, established not only by 39 sound arguments but by the decision by Pope Benedict not to CONTEST any of them demonstrating his resignation was and is invalid in law.

https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/06/09/pope-benedict-has-tacitly-accepted-that-his-resignation-was-canonically-invalid/



"I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson

Offline nottambula

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Reputation: +60/-53
  • Gender: Female
https://twitter.com/VeriCatholici/status/1140322762852093952


Veri Catholici
@VeriCatholici


The events which began and followed from Feb 2013 are without a doubt rightly characterized as as coup d'etat when the entire College of Cardinals and Vatican Curia decided to dump Canon 332 §2, right reason, canonical tradition, logic & metaphysics to remove Benedict from power.
11:18 AM - 16 Jun 2019


Veri Catholici
@VeriCatholici

For six years, despite numerous scholars (in Latin, Canon Law, Canon Law history) and public and private figures, who have all pointed out the same, namely the invalidity of the resignation, the Co-conspirators forge a Church of pretense, that sheer will can rule without right.


Veri Catholici

@VeriCatholici

Being a conspiracy of liars, the only thing that divides them is the truth each wishes to hold fast to, whether of his own making or not. For some want an Anti-Christ (Bergoglio), an idiot (Francis), and some a dual papacy (Francis & Benedict), but none want canon 332 §2.


Veri Catholici

@VeriCatholici

For the truth of canon 332 §2 condemns them all as the most vile and corrupt, proud and stubborn men on the face of the earth and in the history of the entire Church, who insist that ministerium = munus, as if men could alter the meaning of words spoken for 2500 years!


Veri Catholici

@VeriCatholici

O Most Holy Trinity, the One True God of Truth and Unity, illumine the ignorant, make fervent the cold, rebuke the proud and punish the guilty, so that Thy Faithful People might be delivered from this Nightmare of perfidy which has dragged on 6+ years to the damnation of so many!

https://www.ppbxvi.org/

"I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson

Offline King Wenceslas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • Reputation: +65/-69
  • Gender: Male

A horrible scandal to have two men dressed in white walking around the Vatican being called "Holy Father". Scandalous.

The worst situation anyone could have thought of. Especially with one of them being a raging heretic.


Offline Nadir

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5779
  • Reputation: +3182/-179
  • Gender: Female
A horrible scandal to have two men dressed in white walking around the Vatican being called "Holy Father". Scandalous.

The worst situation anyone could have thought of. Especially with one of them being a raging heretic.
One of them? Which one is the raging heretic?

Offline King Wenceslas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • Reputation: +65/-69
  • Gender: Male
One of them? Which one is the raging heretic?

You haven't heard about the latest garbage dump from the Vatican?

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2019-06/vatican-document-on-gender-yes-to-dialogue-no-to-ideology.html

and the response to it.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/from-catholic-to-neo-pagan-sex-education-expert-offers-searing-critique-of-new-vatican-doc-on-gender-theory


Yes the raging heretic is Francis. Benedict is a modernist who didn't dare touch human sexuality.


Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
  • Reputation: +2106/-650
  • Gender: Female
You haven't heard about the latest garbage dump from the Vatican?

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2019-06/vatican-document-on-gender-yes-to-dialogue-no-to-ideology.html

and the response to it.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/from-catholic-to-neo-pagan-sex-education-expert-offers-searing-critique-of-new-vatican-doc-on-gender-theory


Yes the raging heretic is Francis. Benedict is a modernist who didn't dare touch human sexuality.
Is touching human sexuality the only way to be a raging heretic?
"For there is not any thing secret that shall not be made manifest, nor hidden, that shall not be known and come abroad."- Luke 8:17


 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16