(http://judaism.is/images/wojtyla%20genital%20theology.png?crc=4192009916)
https://judaism.is/dishonorable-mentions.html#wojtyla (https://judaism.is/dishonorable-mentions.html#wojtyla)
Wojtyla the Second* Worst
(https://judaism.is/images/jpii-w-rabbi.jpg?crc=4291487873)
Pope John Paul “the Great” • Canonized Saint of the Bipolar Church of Rome
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/05/pope-john-paul-ii-saint-of-bipolar.html (https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/05/pope-john-paul-ii-saint-of-bipolar.html)
What You Need To Know About the Man who Claimed to be the Pope from 1978-2005
https://novusordowatch.org/john-paul-ii/ (https://novusordowatch.org/john-paul-ii/)
The Pope was Jєωιѕн says Historian
A Manchester historian claims that he has proof that the late Pope John Paul II was Jєωιѕн.
Yaakov Wise says his study into the the maternal ancestry of Karol Josez Wojtyla (John Paul II's real name) has revealed startling conclusions. Mr Wise, a researcher in orthodox Jєωιѕн history and philosophy, said the late Pope's mother, grandmother and great-grandmother were all probably Jєωιѕн and came from a small town not far from Krakow.…“I’m not making any firm conclusions, but what I'm saying is that there is a lot of circuмstantial evidence to say that he was Jєωιѕн.…”
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/the-pope-was-Jєωιѕн-says-historian-1067739 (https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/the-pope-was-Jєωιѕн-says-historian-1067739)
* Formerly “Wojtyla the Worst,” until eclipsed by Jorge Bergoglio (https://judaism.is/jorge.html)
The Pope was Jєωιѕн says Historian
A Manchester historian claims that he has proof that the late Pope John Paul II was Jєωιѕн.
Yaakov Wise says his study into the the maternal ancestry of Karol Josez Wojtyla (John Paul II's real name) has revealed startling conclusions. Mr Wise, a researcher in orthodox Jєωιѕн history and philosophy, said the late Pope's mother, grandmother and great-grandmother were all probably Jєωιѕн and came from a small town not far from Krakow.…“I’m not making any firm conclusions, but what I'm saying is that there is a lot of circuмstantial evidence to say that he was Jєωιѕн.…”
Of course he was. Katz was a common Jєωιѕн name, and Wojtyla always played on the Jєωιѕн side when they had soccer games pitting Catholics vs. Jews.
from the article:
Mr Wise said: "According to orthodox Judaism, a person's Jєωιѕн identity is passed down through the maternal line. I saw a photograph of the Pope's mother and I showed it to people who didn't know who she was.
Yeah, she has a rather pronounced nose ... not Polish at all.
(https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/karol-wojtyla-with-his-mother-emilia-of-kaczorowski-family-the-is-picture-id52548142)
(https://insidethevatican.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/The-wedding-portrait-of-John-Paul-II_s-parents-Emilia-and-Karol-Wojty_a-Snr-x.png)
My study of Pope John Paul II involved his contribution to Faith and science, or rather Catholic faith and fiction. We could say his corruption of Supernatural creation began at Vatican II with his contribution to Gaudium et Spes no 36:
‘… The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are. We cannot but deplore certain attitudes (not unknown among Christians) deriving from a short-sighted view of the rightful autonomy of science; they have occasioned conflict and controversy and have misled many into opposing faith and science.’ --- Gaudium et spes, # 36.
Here the boyos of Vatican II accuse St Robert Bellarmine, Pope Paul V and Pope Urban VIII who in 1616 and 1633 defended the geocentric reading of Scripture held by ALL the Fathers. Both Trent and Vatican I had defined that when all the Fathers agree on a matter of faith and morals, and the correct understanding of Scripture is of faith, then that is an infallible belief. bUt here above Cardinal Wojtyla and his lot accuse these churchmen of not knowing what they were doing and that that caused many to be misled into 'opposing faith and science.
The first thing Wojtyla did when becoming Pope John Paul; II was to open up a commission to 'find the rights and wrongs of the Galileo case in 1981. This study ended 11 years later.
In the years awaiting the outcome of the Galileo Commission’s findings, it became plain that theistic-evolution had now become the norm in the Catholic Church as Pope John Paul II’s catechesis asserts:
‘This text Genesis has above all a religious and theological importance. There are not to be sought in it significant elements from the point of view of science…. Indeed, the theory of natural evolution, understood in a sense that does not exclude divine causality, is not in principle opposed to the truth about the creation of the visible world, as presented in Genesis.’ ---- L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 3, 1986.
for centuries the philosophy, theology and metaphysics of St Thomas Aquinas helped guide popes and theologians in clarifying the Faith. Given St Thomas’s teachings on faith and reason did not survive most of the scientific findings of the enlightenment; it was only a matter of time when St Thomas himself also got the boot.
‘With the election of Karol Wojtyła as Pope John Paul II in 1978, there occurred an implicit re-evaluation of French Ressourcement Theology or the “new theology.” John Paul II, who had the highest esteem for [the evolutionist] Henri de Lubac, stopped during a major address in 1980 and acknowledged the presence of de Lubac, saying “I bow my head to Father Henri de Lubac.” When de Lubac became a cardinal in 1983, this elevation by itself rehabilitated his intellectual career, including, by implication, his spirited defence of [the pantheist evolutionist] Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In 1993, John Paul II issued an encyclical which “corrected” Aeterni Patris and Humani Generis. Though the thought of Thomas Aquinas took precedence, the encyclical indicated that other avenues could be explored for the good of the Catholic Church. A genuine competition replaced the Leonine strategy of Aeterni Patris and, later, Humani Generis. Paragraph #29 of Splendor Veritatis stated: “Certainly the Church’s Magisterium does not intend to impose upon the faithful any particular theological system, still less a philosophical one.” --- Homiletic & Pastoral Review.
More to follow.
‘In 1979 Pope John Paul II expressed the wish that the Pontifical Academy of Sciences would conduct an in-depth study of the celebrated and controversial “Galileo case.” A Commission of scholars for this purpose was established in 1981 and on Saturday morning, 31 Oct., 1992 they presented their conclusions to the Pope. .’ -- L’Osservatore Romano.
Under the wishful headline ‘Galileo Case is Resolved,’ what emerged was little more than yet another rendition of the affair and its aftermath as contrived by the army of apologists and minimisers in the Catholic Church over the centuries. After eleven years of ‘work,’ with many books written on different aspects of the Galileo case by the investigating ‘experts,’ the report had a mixed reaction around the world for different reasons. The secular Press made a joke of it, Catholics rejoiced at the outcome, some reading it as a Church teaching, while certain others correctly challenged many details of its content.
Finally we got to to the bit where Wojtyla shows his ability to fool the world. Read this part of his speech;
(11) ‘In Galileo’s time, to depict the world as lacking an absolute physical reference point was, so to speak, inconceivable. And since the cosmos, as it was then known, was contained within the solar system alone, this reference point could only be situated in the Earth or the sun. Today, after Einstein and within the perspective of contemporary cosmology neither of these two reference points have the importance they once had. This observation, it goes without saying, is not directed against the validity of Galileo's position in the debate; it is only meant to show that often, beyond two partial and contrasting perceptions, there exists a wider perception which includes them and goes beyond both of them…’
Here he tells all in front of him realativity now prevails in ther universe. In other words science now admits it cannot prove or falsify heliocentrism or geocentrism. But then he goes on to say this 'IS NOT DIRECTED AGAINST THE VALIDITY OF GALILEO'S POSITION, which of course was a HELIOCENTRIC position.
Such a contradiction in such a historic case like the Galileo case was not noticed by one of the experts present at the time or after it.
‘Paradoxically, Galileo, a sincere believer, showed himself to be more perceptive in this regard than the theologians who opposed him…. We also know his letter to Christine which is like a short treatise on Biblical hermeneutics.’ --Pope John Paul II
Next the Pope enacts what Albert Pike said in his 1871 Morals and Dogma; that faith would succuмb to reason.
‘(8): It is necessary to repeat here what I said above. It is a duty for theologians to keep themselves regularly informed of scientific advances in order to examine if such be necessary, whether or not there are reasons for taking them into account in their reflection or for introducing changes in their teaching.’ --- Pope John Paul II.