Well, it's contrary to charity to not even listen to him or personally give him the benefit of the doubt regardless of his past, but that doesn't mean he should be trusted, especially in any kind of high profile role such as which he held. It's analogous to Michael Voris. I might listen to him, and personally assume that he had left his past life behind, but I would never let my young boys stay over his house for a sleepover, regardless of how "converted" he might be. Same with Salza. It's one thing to have welcomed him to Traditional Catholicism, but to allow him to assume such a high profile role as a regular speaker at conferences, etc.? That's absurd, given that one of Masonry's goals is to infiltrate and subvert. Who's to say that Salza didn't infiltrate Traditional Catholicism precisely to subvert or at least damage it? After his "conversion," he still had no problems receiving awards from Masonic organizations.